the mets could have a 6-7 year window, or a 1-year window, depending on how hard they went at this trade deadline. i think they're looking at this team as capable of competing this year, but also being a juggernaut moving forward with the good prospects they have just about to ripen. alvarez, baty, vientos, and mauricio could all be playing in flushing next year, which frees up a fair bit of capital to throw at pitchers. i like what they're doing in this regard. penciling in those guys as replacements for our offense from this year is what cheap teams do. Even if it frees up the budget for "pitching" I don't know if there's that much pitching available compared to what they're going to potentially lose. At least in the sense that the Mets aren't going to be the only ones after them ,and letting them all happen in free agency means having to overpay for all of them and you STILL might not get them all. There's a lot of turnover coming, which is why fumbling the offseason AGAIN with the GM, and then doing nothing of significance, AGAIN, at the trade deadline is problematic. There's no redundancy or overlap and that's how one failed FA or a key injury at the wrong time derails your plans.