I'm taking literally none of Alderson's public statements about team building seriously. I dunno, I think he's done a good, not great, job and I'm fine with him continuing. I don't know if the next guy would be necessarily better. I think Barwis/injury is a tenuous connection at best. I probably agree that there's a workout connection, but more related to philosophy and goals of the players/team. Barwis is simply the tool used, and he did come highly recommended. In fact, other players come to PSL to work out with him, though it's hard to confirm who. You could argue that the Mets grabbing him and locking him in to THEIR location is actually a coup. Previously players were traveling to Michigan to work out with him anyway, so now they have those players under their roof, with a little more control, and even subsidize it a little if I recall. I mean, there are always going to be concerns. Is it too NFL oriented? (Barwis has plenty of football clients) is it too much weights? too many reps? etc. There's a lot of study on this but there's very little conclusive links between certain workouts/muscles to injuries. It's not like the Mets didn't get hurt before Barwis. Terry via Alderson though. is Alderson sticking around short term? because a new GM would presumably want to have his own crew. So why would you hire another manager if you're gonna dump him in a year or two? And what about the coaches? the offense hasn't shined, OBP has been bad. Is Long out? Warthen's been around forever at this point, but the pitching was..bad..this year. If Terry's gone, does he survive the ax again? Is it time to promote Viola?