yeah, that's just dumb. also dumb is the notion that, though they could afford to do so, the mets might not want to have a very high payroll. now, just having a high payroll in and of itself is no guarantee of success. but if you do it right, and make the wise decisions in building the team with that high payroll, it can certainly be an enabler or success. you should have a payroll commensurate with your ability to afford it, but also commensurate with the team's ability to perform. that is to say that if you can afford to pay the right players, you do. and just because you can afford to pay the wrong players does not mean that you do. arod is more of a right player than a wrong player, given that i think he could be a good first baseman, will produce like the dickens, and has a healthy-looking body that does not seem overly prone to breaking down (though that can always change at the drop of a hat). with him at first, we can afford to find a defensive second baseman, and grow a few corner outfielders. it also, dare i say, alleviates some of the pressure on the pitching staff. which is not to say that we don't need pitching desperately this offseason, only that a good offense is a pitchers good friend.