that's a good point. i guess the counter argument is that it took the AL a while to figure out collectively how to best take advantage of that extra hitter spot in terms of building a team. of course, i then went ahead and looked at the data behind my one argument. and, while i admit it's kindof flawed, it is still rather interesting... i looked at what AL pitchers do versus NL pitchers, and at what AL DH's do versus NL DH's. AL pitchers turned in the following line over 278 at bats in 544 games played: 0.094 / 0.125 / 0.129 A/O*/S 22 singles, 4 doubles, 2 homers, 10 walks, 20 runs scored, and 12 runs driven in, with 125 strikeouts NL pitchers turned in teh following line, 0.138 / 0.176 / 0.177 A/O*/S which scaled down to 278 at bats gives us: 31 singles, 6 doubles, 1 homer, 13 walks, 16 runs scored, 15 runs driven in, with 108 strikeouts. for NL DH's, we get the following line in 438 at bats, 0.283 / 0.360 / 0.473 A/O*/S 79 singles, 26 doubles, 19 homers, 53 walks, 54 runs scored, 64 runs driven in, with 89 strikeouts. for AL DH's, we get the following line: 0.256 / 0.335 / 0.444 A/O*/S which scaled down to 438 at bats gives us: 70 singles, 22 doubles, 1 triple, 20 homers, 52 walks, 62 runs scored, 67 runs driven in, with 99 strikeouts. so... i guess... the NL should be getting the distinct advantage here. what the hell was i talking about?! though, the effect of the DH on an NL team is often that a superior offensive player "gets the day off" and plays DH, whereas a lesser offensive player takes his place. so maybe that's the difference. don't even begin to think that i'm about to tackle the answer to that question though! *i treat OBP as (H+BB)/(AB+BB) realizing that there's more that goes into the calculation. its just that those data are typically not on the first page of stats that one finds on web sites, and its not worth finding the SF's and SH's etc that factor into the rest of the equation. their influence is far smaller than hits, walks, and at bats.