TransMonk wrote: It's not about marketing Cuddyer, but rather management possibly implying that any one move is the only or best move. I don't see this team as just one player away. I hope the team gets shaken up. Move Murphy. Move Wheeler. Change some parts. With all the young arms, I think there are several options to re-think the roster without spending a bunch more money in the short term. But I can't take the rinse and repeat of adding a marginal player and somehow thinking the team is on track to win more than 80 games. Cuddyer would be a great pick up...as a supporting addition in conjunction with other moves. Agreed. My concern is that they'll pick up Cuddyer and call it a day on offensive additions. And if he gets injured or gets his ears caught in a mechanical rice picker, well, we're right back to healthy servings of den Dekker & Nieuwenhuis. I'd like Cuddyer, if they get him, to be a better-hitting Eric Campbell, playing all over the place to give Wright, Duda, Granderson et al a rest. That means you still need to add an everyday outfielder. But the FO won't look at it that way. He'll be the every day left or right fielder. And that's my concern; just like they played Chris Young every day because they paid him a lot of money, they'll play Cuddyer every day to justify the expenditure. I want this roster shaken up a little more than just adding a 36-year-old FA.