Centerfield wrote: 41Forever wrote: What's interesting is that what worked for the Braves wasn't necessarily spending big -- their payroll was about $30 million less than the Mets -- but that their guys were healthy. Wow! That really is interesting. Boy that will really stick in the craw of those guys who say a high payroll is a prerequisite to winning! In your face! This is so much bullshit. The less a team spends, the less margin for error there is. Like FK wrote, the Braves won because almost everything broke in their favor. That almost never happens. Money lets a team cover up mistakes and bad outcomes. The what if we had Cespedes argument is even more bullshit. Because you can say that about practically any team --- if everything went right, they would've won. If nobody got hurt and everybody had a career year, they would've made the playoffs. It's the most tiresome and nebulous and infantile argument out there. If the Nats players had great seasons and Murphy was available all season and in MVP form, they woulda won 100 games. If Jose Fernandez didn't die in a boat crash, the Marlins wouldn't have torn down their roster and they'd have the best team in baseball today at the right ages and they'd win 100 games. Yada, yada yada. It's so fucking obvious that the Wilpons are doing everything right because, you know ..... two first place finishes in 30 seasons.