Yeah, I'd say so. There's a definite scale of importance here. Exchange a win in 2018 for a win in 2017? No way, Jose (or Norichka). Move down a couple of positions in the 2018 draft in exchange for a couple of wins in 2017? Sure. I don't know if anyone has calculated the expected value in future wins per season that we'd lose if we moved from our current middling spot to a slightly lower middling spot, but if it were more than 0.03 (with a high standard deviation on that 0.03), I'd be shocked. I'd trade that for a couple of "meaningless" 2017 victories. And, as someone (Ceetar, I think) pointed out once, the better the team plays, the more value we can get for our guys in an offseason trade. So there's some marginal value to winning besides the intrinsic value that winning always has. It's just not very much. So, LET'S GO METS (kind of, sort of)!!!