I don't like when people try to characterize the debate as whether race is the reason, or whether race is not the reason. For some reason, people, like the quoted LSU professor, don't seem to entertain the notion that there are shades of gray between their black and white stances (no pun intended). Is race the reason Bonds is scrutinized? Probably not. Is race a factor? I would guess yes. The relevant question should be how much of a factor it is. And I would guess that answer varies depending on who, what and when. That being said, I would guess his personality is probably the bigger factor. I have little doubt that if Bonds were as accessible and fair with the media as Michael Jordan, he would not be under this type of microscope. I doubt that if he wore a big smile and said goofy things like Shaquille O'Neal, he would be treated the way he's treated now. Does this mean black athletes have to be happy-types to gain acceptance? (I think we already had this thread) What if Bonds had been white and surly? I honestly don't know the answer to these questions. What I do know is that to say what Bonds is going through will be 100 times worse than Aaron is just silly. Aaron was a black athlete in the South, thirty years ago. There's just no comparison. I don't know why people say things like this and undermine their credibility. And praying for Barry Bonds every night? Please.