No. And I said as much in the next paragraph and provided my reasoning for why.
David Stearns deserves credit for Milwaukee’s success while he was there. And although we will never know how much of that success was attributable to him versus those around him, ultimately he was in charge and deserves the credit.
The success of Milwaukee after he left could be proof that he put a successful system in place and that the current regime is still benefiting from that. It can just as easily mean that the current regime of Mark Arnold and crew were the keys to success all along and David Stearns was there taking credit for it. We have no idea which is correct. And depending on your agenda, you can make a credible argument either way.
All we can reasonably conclude is that Mark Arnold has been in charge the last three years, and under his watch the Brewers have not only continued winning, but gotten better. And have now reached the World Series. And like Stearns before him, we don’t know how much of that is attributable to Mark Arnold, but ultimately he is in charge and deserves the credit.