Yeah, his description of the source, and his lack of clarity on the highest offer statement is the issue. It's lazy at best. At worst, it's intentionally vague to cover how weak his source is. Earlier he wrote: And there's one other perk Steinbrenner and his braintrust will emphasize as well. “It's the idea of pairing up with (Aaron) Judge, and going to the playoffs practically every year,” is how one source, familiar with the Yankees' strategy, put it. So there. He's a little clearer. The source is familiar with the Yankees strategy. It might be someone within the organization. But the news, if you can call it that, is that someone close to the Yankees knows they will stress the relationship with Aaron Judge. Then: As another MLB executive said, “I expect there to be a decision fairly quickly” based on Boras' failed strategies last year. The source here is another MLB executive. This person presumably doesn't have any knowledge of the Yankees thinking. But is speculating. And then the real nugget of info. He's believed to be “all in” on Soto, according to one source. But that's no guarantee the Yankees will be the highest bidder. To the contrary, Steinbrenner has a realistic expectation that Mets' owner Steve Cohen will offer Soto the biggest contract — both in dollars and length of commitment. Again. No description of the source. Is this the same source as the Judge quote above? Probably not. He'd say something like "that same source". Does this source also have knowledge of the Yankees' thinking? If so, why not say so. And is the source responsible for the first "all in" statement, or the no guarantee part as well? And what about the realistic expectation that Cohen will outbid the Yankees. Is that from that same source? It's so infuriating.