I asked a long time baseball fan pal in Canada about Mark Shapiro (as per Sherman's article). Here are his comments: The Mets are a large market team that spends like a small market team, so of course Shapiro's name has come up. He's a fine yes man who will toe the company line and never ask for anything more from ownership. He's built a solid career in baseball without really being a baseball guy. His strength is finding good qualified people to fill the roles underneath him, and being receptive to their ideas. There are a lot of people around MLB front offices who were once hired by Shapiro. His weakness is his loyalty. Most of his good hires move on to higher roles elsewhere, and he'll stick with his failures like Ross Atkins. That guy has never shown a competence to do anything, and it's led to him a GM role under Shapiro (he built his resumé as farm director of a system that got little to nothing for years by drafting advanced skill/low ceiling talent like Jeremy Sowers, Jeremy Guthrie and Beau Mills). The Indians were fortunate that Chris Antonetti also showed a loyalty to Cleveland. He was the baseball/sabermetric mind in the Indians front office, even while he was an assistant for years under Shapiro. He passed up multiple opportunities to become GM elsewhere, and the Indians were rewarded when Shapiro left town. I'm thrilled with how it worked out for Cleveland, but a team hiring Shapiro could do worse (although it could also do better)... just hope he builds his staff from scratch, or has a young up-and-comer under his wing to bring along. Shapiro is considered new school, but it's not that he's really an advanced stats junkie himself, he's just open-minded to the approach and will lean on his assistants. It's a more democratic/less authoritarian approach than others (as opposed to, I dunno... maybe Dombrowski?). If Atkins is also packing his bags, be worried. A yes man who will toe the company line, who hires good young people for the organization. Not bad. Later