I'm okay with Kooz on merit, even if his merit is nearly as meritorious as Seaver's and was not what we'd believed to have met the standards for such an honor until now, but it bothers me that they waited 40 years after they booted him to acknowledge it, and fear that if they're doing this "for the fans" there will be no end to it. We'll have gone from having the highest standards, relatively, to the lowest, which will also make the Mets look bad in the realm of public opinion in a different way as the truth is there have been so few retire-worthy players in their employ. I guess my other concern with Kooz is whether they also then wanna go naming Harrelson and Grote and Jones. And Staub. Wright deserves it. Set a bunch of team records, was universally admired by the club, its fans, and baseball overall, never wore another uni. From there you need to go to Hernandez, Strawberry and Gooden but they all have issues. Keith I think overcomes his non-Met years and snowy past by also becoming as distinct in the booth as he was on the field, winning over generations of new Met fans. Just on baseball, his accomplishments as a Met would open to any number of his teammates. Strawberry and Gooden I could be convinced of sooner than Carter for sure but fine if not. I'm one of those assholes who never really warmed to Beltran. I liked him, I acknowledge how good he was, but his Mets career had considerable bad times for him and the team and is just kinda wobbly. I couldn't tell you whether Beltran would want the honor in fact.