Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

World Series ROOTING INTEREST  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. World Series ROOTING INTEREST

    • Chicago Cubs
      12
    • Cleveland Indians
      14


Recommended Posts

Posted


This World Series would have a great storyline if it just had the Cubs but it also has the Indians. Two long-suffering franchises. "Rookie of the Year" vs. "Major League." Wow.
Screw it, the Mets aren't in it. But someone has to win... who do you WANT to win?


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Cub fans need to suffer a few more decades.


Guest themetfairy
Guests
Posted


I'm currently in a "I don't really give a shit" mood, but we'll see if that changes over the next couple of days.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


This'll sound a little mean, maybe (and a few good friends are Northside-aligned), but the nasty little post-Mets-elimination elf inside me thinks it would be hilarious to watch Cubs fans watching Cleveland celebrate on the Wrigley infield.


Posted


I always root for the NL team (Well, with some exceptions, when I abstain).
This year, I won't have any problems doing it.

Later


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
the nasty little post-Mets-elimination elf inside me thinks it would be hilarious to watch Cubs fans watching Cleveland celebrate on the Wrigley infield.

Sign me up!


Posted


I want to see baseball history, and both teams could provide that. But that 1908 thing--I'd like to see that drought end during my lifetime.


Posted


I sometimes don't know heading into a 'neutral' World Series who I'm going to root for until several games in when I find myself pulling for one over the other.
I suspect in this case that I'm going to be pulling for the Cubs (so I voted that way in the poll) although not so much that I don't want to see them at least have to sweat for it.


Posted


Cubs are bidding to become only the second team to be eliminated by the Mets in the postseason one year and win the World Series the next. I'm going with that as my storyline of choice, though I have nothing against the Tribe and would be very happy on behalf of a friend who's been rooting for Cleveland since the days of Leon "Daddy Wags" Wagner.

Move over 1970 Orioles. You might have company in learning how to win from a Mets team that took you to school.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
I sometimes don't know heading into a 'neutral' World Series who I'm going to root for until several games in when I find myself pulling for one over the other.
I suspect in this case that I'm going to be pulling for the Cubs (so I voted that way in the poll) although not so much that I don't want to see them at least have to sweat for it.


Yup. In theory, when the post-season started, I figured I would root for the Cubs.

But watching the NLCS made me realize I can't root for those smug bastards. I had to remind myself several times "Remember Utley. Remember Scoscia. Remember you hate the Dodgers." So I'll turn on the TV and see which way I start rooting and just go with it. Probably Cleveland.


Posted


Cubs.

1. It's been a long time.
2. I saw a Mets game at Wrigley and the Cubs fans were incredibly welcoming, even knowing I was rooting for the Mets. It's truly the friendly confines.
3. Giving David Wright the third base bag last year. Now, that's class.
4. My daughter is in Chicago and works near Wrigley. She's never cared for baseball, but it getting into it a bit this year.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Interesting we're so evenly divided.


Posted


Al Rosen (Who got a cuppa' Joe) was on the 1948 Cleveland World Series Champs.
Ernie Banks has passed away.
But the Cubs can win one for Billy Williams.

Later


Posted


MFS62 wrote:
Al Rosen (Who got a cuppa' Joe) was on the 1948 Cleveland World Series Champs.
Ernie Banks has passed away.
But the Cubs can win one for Billy Williams.


There is one remaining member of the 1948 champion Indians team still alive -- http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/r/robined01.shtml

I haven't checked all of them, but I suspect that the 1908 Cubs have no such still-living players.


Posted (edited)


I'm with the Indians...but I'd be fine with a Cubs win, too.

I live in relatively close proximity to Cub Land and have many Cub-fan friends. There have been more than a few peeps jumping on the bandwagon this year and last. It is hard to tell the difference between who the genuine long-suffering fans are and those who are just experiencing the Cubs for the first time now that they are built to succeed. I do have several childhood friends (thanks for keeping us in touch, Facebook!) that were Cubs fans then and are Cubs fans now...and I do hope the Cubs win it for them. But the swath of "new" Cubs fans were ready to host the World Championship flag on Opening Day and haven't shut up about it since.


Edited by Guest
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...