Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Worries here


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket

Recommended Posts

Posted


I worry that I'm getting too cocky. Invites punishment from the baseball gods.

After the game yesterday I'm looking at the pitching matchup and wondering how the Metd could lose today. Very dangerous train of thought.


  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Old-Timey Member
Posted


Elster88 wrote:
Terry makes questionable decisions.

During yesterday's post game interview, Terry said he'd be looking for" spots to give Conforto a rest".

Memo to Terry:
The kid is en fuego.
He has hit .407 (according to SNY) since he has been inserted into the third spot in the lineup.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Later


Posted


MFS62 wrote:
Terry makes questionable decisions.

During yesterday's post game interview, Terry said he'd be looking for" spots to give Conforto a rest".

Memo to Terry:
The kid is en fuego.
He has hit .407 (according to SNY) since he has been inserted into the third spot in the lineup.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Later


I have no problem with giving Conforto a seat once in a while, even if he's been mashing lately. Occasional rests are good things. An outfield of Cespedes-Lagares-Granderson doesn't exactly suck. Conforto has benefited from facing almost all righties; he's only 3-12 on the season against lefties.

I didn't get leaving Wright and Plawecki in for the full 9 innings of that 13-1 game, either.


Guest cooby classic
Guests
Posted


The sun will never come out again. Though that is not specifically a baseball worry


Posted


Plawecki was going to sit the next game anyway as a DGANG, and the same decision about Wright may have been made beforehand as well.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Plawecki was going to sit the next game anyway as a DGANG, and the same decision about Wright may have been made beforehand as well.


I'm not sure Plawecki needed to be sat there either, not like he's played anything like regular yet. Though I guess he's got a week or so in now right?

With Wright I'm not sure what's best for him. It's not like it's an injury and there doesn't seem to be any risk of fatigue and wear and tear making the condition worse. I guess normal back injury/stiffness type stuff might make it so he's unable to get loose the next day, but it feels very binary to me. Either he's loose enough to play, or he's not. Might be good just for his peace of mind not to yank him after one inning when he put 2 hours worth of work in to get ready to play the game.


Guest Mets Willets Point
Guests
Posted


I worry that if the Mets start their backup players and face Madison Bumgarner in every game going forward, that they won't do well.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


I worry it's May, and the Braves come in and sweep the Mets.
not really, but if it happens the whammy is all on me


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Pain killers and booze... the fast way to dehydration and still
be able to grow three chins before thirty...

*pure speculation and without intent to slander


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Not worried about Big Harv.

At best he'll rebound in the next few starts.

At worst it's a down year for him and he'll be back to his old self next year.

Either way there's no physical damage and, unlike me, I don't believe he's stupid enough to throw away his potential hundreds of millions for booze, pills or coke.


Posted


soup can wrote:
... I don't believe he's stupid enough to throw away his potential hundreds of millions for booze, pills or coke.


NOW it's a Prince thread!


Posted


They're all stupid enough. We are all stupid enough.

And if I learned nothing else in my years of playing Advanced Dungeons and Dragons, I've learned that intelligence ain't wisdom.


Guest cooby classic
Guests
Posted


d'Kong76 wrote:
Pain killers and booze... the fast way to dehydration and still
be able to grow three chins before thirty...

*pure speculation and without intent to slander


The tiny print thingy still works?


Posted


Contact hitting. Control hitting. It's a largely dead art and it's that much deader with Murphy gone.

Our power all the way through the lineup is a nice thing, but I don't know how many times I can take going through the fifth with a no-hitter going against us. I don't know how many times I'm supposed to congratulate Granderson or Duda on well struck outs that got eaten up by the shift.

I'd rather have the mid-70s Reds than the early sixties Yankees as it were. I mean, it's sure nice to be a good enough that that's something like a real choice, but with the power-ball era over, and the promulgation of shifts, somebody is going to be ahead of the curve on returning to Wee Willie Keeler's philosophy, hitting 'em where they ain't, using the whole field, bunting to keep the defense honest, and protecting with two strikes. I'd like that to be my team.

Doesn't have to be everybody certainly. Let Cespedes swing a big meat hook every at-bat. But our best teams thrived on the virtues of contact hitters like Hernandez and Backman as much as on the big-ripping ways of Strawberry and Johnson. And even more true was the complement they provided to each other.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
But with the power-ball era over, and the promulgation of shifts, somebody is going to be ahead of the curve on returning to Wee Willie Keeler's philosophy, hitting 'em where they ain't, using the whole field, bunting to keep the defense honest, and protecting with two strikes. I'd like that to be my team.


We did get to watch that team for a few games at the end of last season/beginning of this. (Also, last weekend, wearing different unis.)


Posted


Do keep in mind, however, that the Mets' BA & OBA are, despite two low-hit games in the last week, not low but actually right around MLB average (BA a few clicks below, OBA a few above) and that the vaunted 'KC model' is currently DFL in the AL at putting runners across the plate and, across baseball, is out-scoring only the Phils & Braves.


Posted


I'm not vaunting the KC model but rather a hybrid. One that places the batting average (and all metrics) above average, but also spreads the defenders around, puts pressure on the defense, and is capable of grinding out single runs when needed, in addition to scoring them in bunches.

I would also like if they could rotate my tires and help me get my poetry career off the ground, but since we were on the subject, I thought I'd mention it.


Posted


I wish they were better at making adjustments, talking to each other.

I don't know how many guys have to strike out on that Rick Reed Tailing Fastball (I know some guy on the Braves supposedly threw one too) before they start telling each other "Don't give up on that pitch inside".

Conforto's gotta get that bat off his shoulder. Too many called strikes on the inside corner.


Guest cooby classic
Guests
Posted


cooby wrote:
The sun will never come out again. Though that is not specifically a baseball worry

Still worrying


Guest Mets Willets Point
Guests
Posted


A couple of days ago I meant to post that I was worried about how a west coast road trip could dampen the Mets' success, but I'm less worried about that now.


Posted


Honestly, the offense, bullpen and even the defense has been far less concerning to me than I thought they would be back in Spring Training.

The starting pitching still has some hiccups to iron out (ironically, that was my smallest concern five weeks ago), but overall I like this team tight now...especially if Plawecki can provide some offense.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Syndergaard will break at some point. Nobody throws this hard this consistently and doesn't.

Honestly, it's not so much worry, I don't think. More like dread of the inevitable. The only worry is about when, really.


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Syndergaard will break at some point. Nobody throws this hard this consistently and doesn't.


Ahem! How soon they forget.









Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...