Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Gee, it's been great but you have 7-10 days to pack


Recommended Posts

Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Joel Sherman @Joelsherman1 � 6m 6 minutes ago
#Mets expect trade SP, likely Gee, next 7-10 days But might need Shields signed 1st. #sfgiants like Gee, but have to know if getting Shields


Posted


Not quite certain I understand.

1. Am I to understand the Mets are trading Gee to free up room and salary to add James Shields?
2. Or is it that the Giants don't want to trade for Gee until they know Shields is no longer an option for them?
3. Or perhaps, the Mets and Giants are close, but both sides are niggling on the deal, and hoping the ultimate signing of Shields will clarify for both just what a Gee is worth.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN, SHERMAN?!


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


My guess is that it's this: "2. Or is it that the Giants don't want to trade for Gee until they know Shields is no longer an option for them?"


Some mumblings about how the Mets should sign Shields. Hell, if it bumps up the value for Gee it's even better.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Yeah, 2. I think Sherm says the Giants like Gee but might not get him if Shields comes to them at the right price. If Shields goes and signs with some other club, Giants get hotter for G.

I don;t think the Mets want or need Shields.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Yeah, 2. I think Sherm says the Giants like Gee but might not get him if Shields comes to them at the right price. If Shields goes and signs with some other club, Giants get hotter for G.

I don;t think the Mets want or need Shields.


It's just one of the creative solutions people are so drawn to. The idea being if you can't upgrade SS/offense, upgrade run prevention (which also makes bad defense up the middle less damaging?) . And also hoard even more arms in a supply and demand sense. Now you're dealing from an even bigger position of strength when demanding a SS.

It's not a horrible one, does seem unlikely though.


Posted


The only problem with that idea is that you are probably degrading the trade value of any non-prospect age pitcher who you yank from the rotation because clubs dont get recent tape of him pitching every 5th day and coming out of the pen isnt the same.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I like the Shields/Scherzer idea, frankly. At this point, I'd probably rather slightly overpay in money for one of them than overpay in money/prospects for one of the flawed shortstop options out there.

Waylon Flowers and Kenny think others may be in on the Gee-stakes.


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
I like the Shields/Scherzer idea, frankly. At this point, I'd probably rather slightly overpay in money for one of them than overpay in money/prospects for one of the flawed shortstop options out there.


There's a lot of logic here. I worry a lot less about Flores' defense if Scherzer is striking out 12 batters a game.

In all seriousness, there's a LOT of logic to signing Scherzer. Get the best available player (especially in a year when our first round pick has been lost) and worry about having too many starters later.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


I don't think we'll decorate this year, but I'll be happy just so long as my neighbors don't leave their Gee strings up again all January.


Posted


NY Post -- The Giants, Padres and Rockies have all been mentioned as potential landing spots for the right-hander, but
a source indicated at least one AL team has shown interest.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


three to six days left!


Posted


It pisses me off that they look to be just dumping Gee. He is not an All-Star, but he is a serviceable starter, and not a piece to be discarded.

I hope that they really are getting something back and not just looking to unload salary.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


If they were dumping him expressly for salary purposes, it would have been done by now, no?


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
If they were dumping him expressly for salary purposes, it would have been done by now, no?


Not necessarily. First of all, baseball's still in that off-season period where teams don't have to pay their players. So if the Mets truly are over budget, they still won't feel that pinch. Also, even if the Mets are looking to trade Gee for a player who'll make close to the minimum, if even that, they still want to obtain the best player possible, even if circumstances limit their options. Also, assuming the Mets need to reduce their current payroll level, their salary dump might not necessarily be evident simply from their pending Gee trade. We'll need to look at all of their upcoming trades in totality to determine whether they might be dumping salary. It might be easier to simply look at their payroll a few months from now to come to any conclusions.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


If it was strictly about payroll reduction I'm unsure of why they'd sign Cuddyer instead of just trading Gee, whenever that is, for an OFer? I mean hell, there's probably a Cuddyer type player out there that someone would offload for Gee.


Posted


The problem with Geetrading is that the signing of Scherzer was supposed to tighten up the pitching market as teams rush after next-best options. But by Scherzer signing with an already pitching-rich team, it ends up likely sending somebody (possibly Jordan Zimmerman) into the trade market to compete with Gee.


Guest sharpie
Guests
Posted


However, with Ryan Vogelsong going to the 'Stros, then the Giants have a real need to find another starter and that is one of the teams to which Gee seems to be mentioned in the same breath as.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Zero to 2 days left!


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


It's getting so close to happening or not happening or not happening for right now!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...