Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Actually Curtis


G-Fafif

Recommended Posts

Posted


i like this a lot. i like granderson at 4/60 a lot better than i would have liked ellsbury at 7/150, or cano at 10/240.

also, i really hope not to see eric young take a meaningful, everyday role on this team. he's a useful spare part, but should not be an everyday player. if he's in our outfield and lagares is not, i'll be quite unhappy.

moreso if he's at second and murphy is not, (unless there's a massive return).


Posted


regarding granderson's power, if you look to hittrackeronline, you can take a loot at grandy's home runs, normalized for atmospheric conditions, and compare them against ballpark dimensions.

last year, each of grandy's homers easily clears our right field fence.
in 2012, all but 9 of hte 43 homers he hit clear our fences. last i checked, 34 homers wouldn't be so bad. and a lot of them are gappers that could turn into extra bases and not just long fly outs. with his speed, maybe there's some extra triples in there. who knows.
in 2011, there's 4-6 of his 41 homers that might not make it out.

dude's got power. he's no cheap yankee stadium sham-homerun illusion.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


metsmarathon wrote:


dude's got power. he's no cheap yankee stadium sham-homerun illusion.


wind conditions, pitchers, etc. but yeah.

My only real concern there is that it seems like he may have altered his approach in 2012 in a homer happy way that led to a not very good season despite hitting a bunch. That approach has all the makings of trouble.

but I have faith that wouldn't be the case.


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
It's nice to get another one of the good guys, anyway. And DINGERS!

I hope I'm really, really wrong about how this will play out.


I hope I'm wrong about this, too.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Why does ESPN's ticker report all deals as "According to ESPN and 'media sources'"

Does that mean "yeah, other people said this and we're going to tell you about it like we're intimately involved, after we talk about Tim Tebow and tell you meaningless things about football."


Guest 86-Dreamer
Guests
Posted


Assuming he gets $15 million in 2014, the payroll projects now to approx. $78.8 million:

http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/NYM/2013-payroll-salaries.shtml

Last year's payroll was $89 million. Hopefully they will go to at least $95 which would leave Sandy $16m to get a starting pitcher and at least one more credible major league bat.

I think Arroyo is the logical next move in the $10-11 million range and then will take some skilled trading to squeeze a bat into the budget. I think they will regret tendering Ike.


Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Why does ESPN's ticker report all deals as "According to ESPN and 'media sources'"


It's their way of saying that they were beaten to the story (or, at best, that they reported it no earlier than 956 other sources) but still get to credit themselves with being among the ones cited as the source of this material.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
Why does ESPN's ticker report all deals as "According to ESPN and 'media sources'"


It's their way of saying that they were beaten to the story (or, at best, that they reported it no earlier than 956 other sources) but still get to credit themselves with being among the ones cited as the source of this material.


Yeah, we were flipping to it at lunch during Millionaire commercials and it seemed like they waited until they had someone ESPN affiliated to talk about that they put it in the "Breaking News" section.


Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
Why does ESPN's ticker report all deals as "According to ESPN and 'media sources'"


It's their way of saying that they were beaten to the story (or, at best, that they reported it no earlier than 956 other sources) but still get to credit themselves with being among the ones cited as the source of this material.


Yeah, we were flipping to it at lunch during Millionaire commercials and it seemed like they waited until they had someone ESPN affiliated to talk about that they put it in the "Breaking News" section.


Yeah, that's been ESPN's MO for decades now. "Don't credit anyone but ourselves."


Posted


Good hitter, good defender, class act, Fills a need. Not a terrible contract.
What's not to like?

Later


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Today's Daily News has a photoshopped picture of Curtis in his Mets uniform, wearing number 14.

Looked very strange to see that. Obviously, that's not gonna happen.


SMH also at the 50th Anniversary patch, dead giveaway for a Photoshop job!


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Looks like someone clued them in. They've repaired the online version, (the 14 was in the print edition) and removed the 4.


So if he comes in and hits like 75 kabooms or we win the division 3 times in a row the newspaper could become a collectors item? Right? Lemme know before recycling on Monday.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


MFS62 wrote:
Good hitter, good defender, class act, Fills a need. Not a terrible contract.
What's not to like?


Declining hitter (over the last three years, steadily), declining defender (also over the last three years, if less steadily), moving to a position where his bat becomes less valuable, costs a high 2nd-round draft pick, may tie up more payroll than a similar/better asset in trade (Aoki, e.g.) would have.

On the plus side, he'll still have some power, and he's fast, and maybe the glove plays better in right (like, at least a scratch-defender level). Also, he knows Beyonce!


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...