Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


Mets pick twice in the first eleven picks as this thing gets going again in less than an hour - starts with pick #74, Mets pick 76 & 84

Baseball America says that these guys (with BA's pre-draft ranks for them) are the best ones who went undrafted yesterday - for whatever that's worth
25. Jon Denney, c, Yukon (Okla.) HS
34. Connor Jones, rhp, Great Bridge HS, Chesapeake, Va.
35. Kyle Serrano, rhp, Farragut (Tenn.) HS
37. Bobby Wahl, rhp, Mississippi
42. Cord Sandberg, of, Manatee HS, Bradenton, Fla.
48. Rowdy Tellez, 1b, Elk Grove (Calif.) HS
49. Trey Masek RHP 4YR Texas Tech
50. Andrew Mitchell RHP 4YR Texas Christian
58. Ryan Boldt OF HS Red Wing (Minn.) HS
61. Kent Emanuel LHP 4YR North Carolina
63. Tyler O�Neill C HS Garibaldi SS, Maple Ridge, B.C.
65. Dom Nunez C HS Elk Grove (Calif.) HS
66. Garrett Williams LHP HS Calvary Baptist HS, Shreveport, La.
67. Cavan Biggio 2B HS St. Thomas HS, Houston
68. Jared King OF 4YR Kansas State
70. Chandler Eden RHP HS Yuba City (Calif.) HS
72. Chris Okey C HS Eustis, Fla., HS
73. Tyler Skulina RHP/1B 4YR Kent State
75. Jacoby Jones 2B 4YR Louisiana State
78. A.J. Vanegas RHP 4YR Stanford
79. Michael O�Neill OF 4YR Michigan
80. Jake Brentz LHP HS Parkway South HS, Manchester, Mo..
81. Trey Michalczewski 3B HS Jenks (Okla.) HS
84. Garrett Hampson SS HS Reno (Nev.) HS
85. A.J. Puk LHP HS Washington HS, Cedar Rapids, Iowa


Astros take the dude in bold. Cubs up, Mets next.

Edit: Cubs take a kid from BYU just back from his Mormon mission. YOUR NEW YORK METS ON THE CLOCK... #rowdyorbust


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


High school outfielder Ivan Wilson...


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


That fucker can hit.


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:


Ivan Wilson. That's one ugly cap he's wearing.


Signability may be an issue with this kid. He's from a wealthy family in Bel-Air (his father Phil is a successful judge) and he's rumored to be on his way to Princeton. Has a famous cousin, Will, from Philadelphia.



Posted


batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
I'm not sure how the "immoral" aspect is addressed by imposing a cap. A monopoly imposing price controls on the suppliers is the crux of the immorality.


The idea is to strike a balance between allowing the amateur the freedom to choose his employer and yet preserving competitive balance. We all know that the real reason for the draft, despite what MLB has always claimed, is mainly to control salaries, and thus, team expenses. An amateur has no choice but to play for the team that drafted him or wait at least another year before another team drafts him, and then go through the same process again. But reverting to the pre 1965 way of doing things, where every amateur is essentially a free agent will likely result in the richest teams acquiring the cream of the crop almost always. The author addresses this concern.

Thanks for summarizing, but I'm up for trashing the notion of competitive balance, too. Real competitive balance would allow any team that thought they could pull it off to park a stadium in greater New York and go head-to-head with the Yankees and Mets. You want competitive balance, then don't entertain notions of exclusive access to marketplaces. Greater New York could support six teams.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
I'm not sure how the "immoral" aspect is addressed by imposing a cap. A monopoly imposing price controls on the suppliers is the crux of the immorality.


The idea is to strike a balance between allowing the amateur the freedom to choose his employer and yet preserving competitive balance. We all know that the real reason for the draft, despite what MLB has always claimed, is mainly to control salaries, and thus, team expenses. An amateur has no choice but to play for the team that drafted him or wait at least another year before another team drafts him, and then go through the same process again. But reverting to the pre 1965 way of doing things, where every amateur is essentially a free agent will likely result in the richest teams acquiring the cream of the crop almost always. The author addresses this concern.

Thanks for summarizing, but I'm up for trashing the notion of competitive balance, too. Real competitive balance would allow any team that thought they could pull it off to park a stadium in greater New York and go head-to-head with the Yankees and Mets. You want competitive balance, then don't entertain notions of exclusive access to marketplaces. Greater New York could support six teams.


I'm totally on board with that. But it's less likely to happen than blowing up the draft in the way that Jazayerli sugggests.


Posted


Hey, smart guys, I'm telling 'Fresh Prince' jokes here. Round 4, pick 116, Mets take Lee Mazzilli!!

LJ Mazzilli, second baseman, UCONN.

r0jh71l4Pxg



"Hey, LJ, your shirt's all wrinkled."



LJ: "No problem."



Posted (edited)


Round 5, pick 146, Mets go with their second college kid, Jared King, a switch hitting outfielder from Kansas State. Bro on MLB.tv sez, 'tremendous value, not sure how he lasted 5 rounds.'



Edited by Guest
Posted


ABNS still bored on a quiet day at work and bringing you exciting draft news you can easily find ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET... Round 7, pick 206, and your New York Mets take...

Matt Oberste, first baseman, University of Oklahoma. BA's Jim Callis 'really likes this guy'. Here he is wearing a whack-ass helmet:



Posted


1976 and 2013. Like father, like son.

"Undershirts for other men, Junior. Lesser men."



"What's an undershirt, Pop?"


Posted


I don't know if it's coincidence or design, but they're drafting older players in the later rounds.

The first four guys were all born in 1994 or 1995, but the next four were 1990, 1991, 1992, 1991.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I don't know if it's coincidence or design, but they're drafting older players in the later rounds.

The first four guys were all born in 1994 or 1995, but the next four were 1990, 1991, 1992, 1991.


the 'trick' last year at least was to draft college seniors in the 7-10th round or so because they have zero leverage and will sign for whatever you tell them. You then take that money and give it to the high rounders, or a gamble pick at 11-15 to entice someone away from going to college.


Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I don't know if it's coincidence or design, but they're drafting older players in the later rounds.

The first four guys were all born in 1994 or 1995, but the next four were 1990, 1991, 1992, 1991.


the 'trick' last year at least was to draft college seniors in the 7-10th round or so because they have zero leverage and will sign for whatever you tell them. You then take that money and give it to the high rounders, or a gamble pick at 11-15 to entice someone away from going to college.


Right. It's a by-product of the new (as of last year) 'Overall Cap' system. There's no limit on what you can spend on any one player but there is on the cumulative total of your first (I think it's Ten) rounds. So, like Ceetar said, by going under the recommended 'slot' on some players you can maybe shift what you save over to a tougher sign.


Posted


Sheesh, it's like tax law. You claim it's designed to help the poor, but all it does is encourage the rich to come up with ever-more-sophisticated dodges.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I don't know if it's coincidence or design, but they're drafting older players in the later rounds.

The first four guys were all born in 1994 or 1995, but the next four were 1990, 1991, 1992, 1991.


the 'trick' last year at least was to draft college seniors in the 7-10th round or so because they have zero leverage and will sign for whatever you tell them. You then take that money and give it to the high rounders, or a gamble pick at 11-15 to entice someone away from going to college.


Right. It's a by-product of the new (as of last year) 'Overall Cap' system. There's no limit on what you can spend on any one player but there is on the cumulative total of your first (I think it's Ten) rounds. So, like Ceetar said, by going under the recommended 'slot' on some players you can maybe shift what you save over to a tougher sign.


Exactly what the Astros did last year. Another great Grantland piece.


Guest Swan Swan H
Guests
Posted


The Mets eighth round pick is named Forrestt Allday. Yes, that's how it's spelled. He should have been a first rounder on his name alone.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...