Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

2006 World Series: Detroit vs. St. Louis


Willets Point

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 221
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest OlerudOwned
Guests
Posted


Rangers v. Leafs, Rutgers v. Pitt.

Screw the Cards.


Posted


Willets Point wrote:
C'mon, you know you're gonna watch.

Verlander toes the mound for the Tigers and Reyes counters for the Cardinals in Game 1.


yea--Ill watch.
Cuz after this series Ill be going thru baseball withdrawl.
No more baseball till 2007.
:(


Posted


First matchup of rookie pitchers in a game #1 in World Series history. I thought that happened in 1997 with Jaret Wright and Levan Hernandez, but I guess that wasn't game #1.


Posted


Willets Point wrote:
First matchup of rookie pitchers in a game #1 in World Series history. I thought that happened in 1997 with Jaret Wright and Levan Hernandez, but I guess that wasn't game #1.


..interesting.

Okay--I need to be more interested in this series.
Can anyone else say something to make this more interesting?

1-0 Tiggers score 1st, in the 1st of the 1st game.


Posted


Waht did Belliard do?
Stick his finger in an electrical outlet or something?

mmm-thats interesting-his new doo.
He looks like the fourth stooge.


Posted


1-1 as the Cards answer back.
Rolin smacks one.

Yea WP--Endy wouldnt caught that one.


Posted


The Ugly Duncan drives in run #2 for St Lou.

And Pujols goes yard. Wow.
They coulda walked him.Yow.

4-1 Cards


Guest OlerudOwned
Guests
Posted


That Verlander kid is no Johnny Maine.


Posted


Tim Mac on Leyland:
"You can disagree with pitching to Pujols but you cant disagree with his honesty."

HA!
Paaaaaleese Timmy. Spare me.
And make sense, will ya?


Posted


Willets Point wrote:
Apparently, it wasn't that the Mets offense that was failing but that the Cardinals pitching made a deal with the devil.


I hope they did.
Cause next season there WILL be hell to pay.


Lets see-.....!!!--7-1? 7th?
Cards?

Whats all this then?


Posted


Natural and Ivan Rodriguez, words you'd never thought you'd hear ever!

BTW Timmy, Ivan's HOF-ness diminished with his "power"


Posted


SteveJRogers wrote:

BTW Timmy, Ivan's HOF-ness diminished with his "power"


..and his steroidness.

Well, that was boring and sucked.

Cards tame the Tiggers in game one, 7-2.


Posted


I don't think Pudge's chance of making the HOF has diminished. He's one of the best defensive catchers ever and has had one of the most consistent offensive careers of anyone over the past 15+ years.

As for his power, whatever the allegations about him getting "smaller" over the past few years, he's only hit over 30 HRs once in his career and over 20 five times. I've certainly never considered his power to be one of his top three attributes.


Posted


Monk, the HOF voters rarely go for defense - at any position.
I can think of, um, Ozzie, Mazeroski and...., uh, that' s it recently. Two of the best all-time defensive players at their position - Hodges and Hernandez - would have received more votes if defense were highly regarded. But didn't get enough to get voted in.

I agree with others above that it will be his bat that gets, or doesn't get, Pudge into the Hall. Not just his glove.

Back to the series.
I am so so happy that the Cardinals won. Maybe it will stop the reporters like the one in USA Today who predicted "Tigers in three" because the NL is "so bad".

Later


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I don't think he meant to suggest "just his glove."

And Hernandez and Hodges are two of the best at the least important, most say, of defensive positions. Pudge is one of the best at the most important.


Posted


Just to comment on last night...

the National League team after a tightly-contested 7-game series
on one day rest
pitching an unreliable rookie out of desperation
against the well-rested Tigers and their rookie ace
in a road game
won in dominating fashion.

Can we put the AL is better than the NL myth to bed now?


The Tiggers have an early lead on a Craig Monroe homer tonight.


Posted


I tuned in for a second and heard them talking about possibly illegal substances on Kenny Rogers hand that had since been removed.

Hmmm, maybe the Gambler's post season renaissance ain't so mysterious after all.

Paging Mr. Scott, Mr. Mike Scott.


Guest Iubitul
Guests
Posted


They had a shot of a close up of his hand that they claimed showed a discoloration - looked more like a shadow to me.


Posted


]Can we put the AL is better than the NL myth to bed now?


No, because the AL beat the NL during interleague this year at rates roughly equivelent to Johnson beating Goldwater. The outcome of this series - and especially one game from the series - shouldn't be used to either erase what's gone on all season.

That said, there are various over-generalizations that are going on with various fan and media types on this subject.
One is this assumption that this lop-sidedness has been true for years. It hasn't; prior to this season, it was the NL which held a slight edge over the first 9 years of IL play.
Another is treating the WS (or, even worse, All-Star games) as a true measure of league strength. Not only does this takes the idea a 'small sample' to an extreme but it's also just one team vs another. In-season IL play is so much better because it's ~240 games/year and pits the good, bad & ugly from each league against each other.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...