Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

"Mets Un-American for Hushing Delgado"


Guest Edgy DC

"Mets Un-American for Hushing Delgado"  

5 members have voted

  1. 1. "Mets Un-American for Hushing Delgado"

    • Yes
      5


Recommended Posts

Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


This whole controversy, to paraphase our dignified new first baseman is "the stupidest thing ever."

O'Connor is right to the extent of his overarching point, but the Mets in all probability don't give a rat's ass what Delgado thinks about poilitics, they're only acting to quell idiotic questions from journalists posing as patriotic tattletales in pursuit of a scandal backstory that doesn't require any serious committment of time or work to uncover, so they point out there's a team policy that covers standing for attention, hope the lazy journos buy it, and deal with the O'Connor-like criticism.


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


Eighty-friggin-two words in that sentence, folks. Top that.


Guest KC
Guests
Posted


I have two words on the subject - Manny Ramirez.

I wonder if The Daily Mirror ran a headline: NEW YORK METS - PRO BUSH, PRO WAR


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


O'Connor also decorates his column with a blow-dried and Vitalis-sprayed mug shot that would make Biff Thunderpants blush:



I may make it my new avatar. The best part is that the jacket I'm wearing this morning has the same pattern as Biff's. I mean Ian's.


Posted


lets take a quick informal poll. how many of youze guyze employers would permit overt political protests and/or demonstrations during work hours, and on their property, particularly those which may cause their customers to take their business elsewhere?

i'm guessing not many.

democracy exists betweeen your front door and the reception desk at your office.


Posted


Yo Healey...read those two articles and you'll see those poor journalistic practices that you don't believe exist. Both take Delgado's comment that the war is "the stupidest war ever" and make it seem that that was the reason he didn't stand for "God Bless America". At least the first article Edgy linked to mentions the real reason why he didn't stand for the song, but it's in passing. They both say it's protesting the war in Iraq that is the reason why he didn't stand.

I may get off my lazy ass and write a note to these peeps. Can't do it during the day, but later maybe.


Posted


metsmarathon wrote:
lets take a quick informal poll. how many of youze guyze employers would permit overt political protests and/or demonstrations during work hours, and on their property, particularly those which may cause their customers to take their business elsewhere?

i'm guessing not many.

democracy exists betweeen your front door and the reception desk at your office.


Excellent. Well said.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I'm not sure I've seen anything about the Mets unwritten policy as stated that won't allow Delgado, on most Sundays, to skedaddle into the clubhouse and sit out the song, which is pretty much what he's been doing.


Posted


82 words, JD? I dare you to diagram that baby.

I think the Mets are just trying to cut any potential distraction at the pass. And Delgado handled the questions quite well yesterday.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


We have three votes for Un-American. Anybody want to forward the argument?


Posted


When your at work you play by the rules of the ones who sign your paycheck.
I dont care what Delgado thinks about the current conflict, and I dont care what any baseball player thinks of the state of the nation.


Posted


I'm an "eh" also. I understand where the Mets are coming from, but I also think the GBA thing is unnecessary. That said, if he wants to sit in the clubhouse and protest, he's well within his rights to do so.


Guest Rotblatt
Guests
Posted


I think the workplace comparisons aren't apt. I mean, if our workplace, in addition to requiring us to stand for the National Anthem at 9:00 a.m. every day, also asked us to stand and recite the pledge of allegiance every day at noon, would we all do it?

I wouldn't. And if they made it a policy instead of a request, I might because I generally like my job, but I'd be pretty pissed off about it.

I originally voted "Eh" but I'm kind of leaning towards un-American now.


Posted


Good point. I wouldn't like being forced to do that at my workplace either.

However, Delgado's job and workplace has a whole public relations aspect that mine doesn't have. If I don't recite the Pledge before I sit down at my desk, the media won't be all over the story.

But the Mets shouldn't be fearing the media. They should let Carlos do his thing. And they probably should reserve the patriotic 7th-inning stretch displays for July 4 and Memorial Day.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Delgado's workplace also had benefits numbering in the millions that mine doesn't have, to offset some unpleasant aspects. You make a quick little cost-benefit analysis, as we all do.


Guest sharpie
Guests
Posted


Better yet, dispense with God Bless America entirely. Dreary song.


Posted


Let's seperate church and state. No more God Bless America. No shedding his grace on thee. Stick with our ten minute national anthem that no one can sing correctly.


Posted


I think too much is made of this church and state thing, and I'm as unreligious as they come.

I say "God bless you" when someone sneezes, although it doesn't mean anything to me.

Even though I don't believe in Yahweh, I accept the God in "God bless you" and "God Bless America" and "God willing" etc. as an allegorical God. It doesn't offend me at all.

When the September 11 attacks occurred, it was "God Bless America" that everyone wanted to hear and sing. Even though it's not official, for all practical purposes, it is our National Anthem.


Guest martin
Guests
Posted


i think churches are unamerican for forcing their employed preachers to respect jesus. where is the freedom?


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I didn't want to hear it. Other than that, I agree that too much is made of the SoCaS. For one, the Mets and MLB --- despite their corporate welfare --- aren't quite the state, and if they want to bombard me with crappy music (and they do, with regligius or secular references) it's their right to do it, and my right to take my entertainment dollar elsewhere.

I'm a little more peeved that the anti-trust exemption MLB enjoys limits where I can talke that dollar.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...