Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted November 3, 2025 Posted November 3, 2025 Ron Howard's OPS, to be fair, did not go down because his performance declined. He left TV to direct films, but he might well have stayed just as productive had he stuck to sitcom acting. I mean, he carried Potsie and Ralph for years, give the guy some credit at least
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2025 Posted November 4, 2025 Of the top 25 OPS leaders in 2025, 10 of those players were in the 31-35 age range FK mentions. 1. Aaron Judge (33)3. George Springer (35)5. Kyle Schwarber (33)7. Ketel Marte (31)9. Byron Buxton (31)11. Freddie Freeman (35)13. Jose Ramirez (32)18. Matt Olson (31)19. Yandy Diaz (33)22. Bryce Harper (32)So clearly, there is precedent for Pete staying productive for at least a few more years.On the other hand, in this article chronicling the worst contracts on the books for 2025, we see a lot of guys in that age range.https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10144883-ranking-the-10-worst-mlb-contracts-on-the-books-for-2025-seasonAnthony Rendon. Fell off a cliff after age 29. Nick Castellanos. Regressing since age 31DJ Lemahieu. Aged suddenly after age 31Andrew Benitendi. Somehow washed up at age 28Trevor Story. Plummeted after age 28Xander Bogaerts. Declined after age 30.Javier Baez. Declined after age 28Kris Bryant. Done after age 29If you look at these names, it makes it seem like Pete may be on borrowed time already.Interestingly, the article mentions these five guys, who all bounced back to varying degrees of success in 2025.Christian YelichGeorge SpringerGiancarlo StantonTrevor StoryMike Trout
The Hot Corner Old-Timey Member Posted November 4, 2025 Posted November 4, 2025 I could be wrong, but I don't believe Pete's game will age well. He makes his living off one basic skill, he hits the ball hard. He is an elite power hitter. He has also been very durable and reliable. He does not hit for average, he doesn't run well, he fields reasonable well, but with very limited range. His throwing is not a strength. Unfortunately, his rather one dimensional skill set, makes him best suited to be a DH, particularly as he ages. That said, I would love to see the Mets resign Pete. Preferably to a 3 year deal, but I could see going 4 is the numbers aren't too crazy.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted November 4, 2025 Posted November 4, 2025 Ron Howard's OPS, to be fair, did not go down because his performance declined. He left TV to direct films, but he might well have stayed just as productive had he stuck to sitcom acting. I mean, he carried Potsie and Ralph for years, give the guy some credit at least As long as the Mets don't sign Chachi as some sort of ******** replacement, I'm good either way.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2025 Posted November 17, 2025 Josh Naylor off the board. Goes back to Seattle on a five year deal. I didn’t like Naylor as an option. And that takes Seattle out of the Pete sweepstakes. So I think good result all around. Naylor is 2 years younger than Pete. So 5 year deal makes sense.
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2025 Posted November 17, 2025 Josh Naylor off the board. Goes back to Seattle on a five year deal. I didn’t like Naylor as an option. And that takes Seattle out of the Pete sweepstakes. So I think good result all around. Naylor is 2 years younger than Pete. So 5 year deal makes sense. I think Pete wants his own five (or six?) year deal. He's a much more proven power hitter than Naylor, who's exceeded 20 HRs exactly once in his career.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2025 Author Posted November 17, 2025 He wanted that last year too but it doesn't seem like any team came close to going there.Granted he's coming off a better season this time but is also a year older.I thought last year that the Mets might go to four but were willing to let him walk if someone went five.With another year under his belt it's possible the Mets would balk at four this time around.Naylor? I just met her!
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted November 17, 2025 Posted November 17, 2025 It's hard to know what, if anything, Naylor's deal means for Alonso. Especially since we don't know the terms yet.Other than the position they play, Naylor is really different than Alonso. He's a different kind of hitter. Higher average, better contact, but much less power. A lesser hitter overall. But he's 2 and a half years younger, a better defender, and a better base stealer. My guess is that Naylor gets less AAV, more years. Pete gets more AAV, less years.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted November 18, 2025 Posted November 18, 2025 BTW, $92.5 million on the Naylor deal. So $18.5M AAV.I think this doesn't really say anything about the market for Alonso.
The Hot Corner Old-Timey Member Posted November 18, 2025 Posted November 18, 2025 BTW, $92.5 million on the Naylor deal. So $18.5M AAV.I think this doesn't really say anything about the market for Alonso. Well, we can likely eliminate the Mariners as suitors for Alanso's services.
The Hot Corner Old-Timey Member Posted November 18, 2025 Posted November 18, 2025 BTW, $92.5 million on the Naylor deal. So $18.5M AAV.I think this doesn't really say anything about the market for Alonso. Well, we can likely eliminate the Mariners as suitors for Alonso's services.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted November 19, 2025 Posted November 19, 2025 BTW, $92.5 million on the Naylor deal. So $18.5M AAV.I think this doesn't really say anything about the market for Alonso. I do think there's something there with respect to the length of a deal Alonso can expect to receive. Anything more than 5 years is less likely with Naylor only getting 5 despite being younger. Of course, as you note, Alonso is likely to be looking for a higher AAV anyway. That said, there is probably some perceived benefit -- even if largely ephemeral -- to a team not committing itself for as many years. Giving Pete $150M over 5 years instead of 8 might be (mostly) a wash financially but the shorter deal still somehow more palatable.
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted December 8, 2025 Posted December 8, 2025 I'm seeing reports that Pete is at the winter meetings in Orlando. He has meetings scheduled with the Orioles and the Red Sox.
Edgy MD Site Manager Posted December 9, 2025 Posted December 9, 2025 He would be a fool not to be there.He works the concourse, gladhands some insiders, sits down with a reporter or two, gets a hello from Ollie Marmol, three articles get written suggesting the Cardinals are talking to him, and his price goes uppity up.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted December 9, 2025 Posted December 9, 2025 I'm seeing reports that Pete is at the winter meetings in Orlando. He has meetings scheduled with the Orioles and the Red Sox. I’m guessing he has no market. That doesn’t sound like the type of thing someone does when he’s heavily pursued.
Centerfield Old-Timey Member Posted December 9, 2025 Posted December 9, 2025 If we lose Pete tell Stearns to stay in Orlando.
MFS62 Old-Timey Member Posted December 9, 2025 Posted December 9, 2025 If we lose Pete tell Stearns to stay in Orlando. Just what I thought.Later
Elian Pena St. Lucie Mets - A SS In St. Lucie's Wednesday doubleheader, the 18-year-old shortstop went 3-for-7 with a walk and his 7th and 8th doubles. He's hitting .346/.460/.481 (.941). Also 8 steals in 9 attempts. Explore Elian Pena News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now