Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 736
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I believe the potential destinations for Pete are dwindling


My not so magic 8 ball says 3/90 somewhere


Not a terrible deal for Pete considering the next contract he signs could be for one year

Posted (edited)

It is not a stadium for Pete but it's mostly about the money


I've been going under the assumption that Stearns does not want Pete back and failing an intervention by Cohen he goes elsewhere


Sure feels like it to me at this point


Washington Nationals sign free agent 1st basemen Josh Bell and another market falls away


The Mets gave an obscene, almost irresponsible amount of money to Soto and now they nickel and dime a lifelong Met and current face of the franchise


Grow some balls Stearns and sign the guy

Edited by ashie62
Posted

I've been going under the assumption that Stearns does not want Pete back and failing an intervention by Cohen he goes elsewhere

 

I suspect he likes Pete for two or three years but not for six or seven.

Posted

It is not a stadium for Pete but it's mostly about the money


I've been going under the assumption that Stearns does not want Pete back and failing an intervention by Cohen he goes elsewhere


Sure feels like it to me at this point


Washington Nationals sign free agent 1st basemen Josh Bell and another market falls away


The Mets gave an obscene, almost irresponsible amount of money to Soto and now they nickel and dime lifeling Met and current face of the franchise


Grow some balls Stearns and sign the guy

 

This is my response

Posted

It is not a stadium for Pete but it's mostly about the money


I've been going under the assumption that Stearns does not want Pete back and failing an intervention by Cohen he goes elsewhere


Sure feels like it to me at this point


Washington Nationals sign free agent 1st basemen Josh Bell and another market falls away


The Mets gave an obscene, almost irresponsible amount of money to Soto and now they nickel and dime a lifelong Met and current face of the franchise


Grow some balls Stearns and sign the guy

 

This is my response

Posted

If Stearns doesn't want Pete and Cohen intervens then what's the point? Just run the team yourself


I don't think this is the case

Posted

I'm certain that the issue is not the presence or absence of balls in the pants of the Mets' president.


I also dispute the notion that Alonso is "the current face of the franchise."

Posted

"Face of the franchise" is a subjective title, to be sure.


I would say, though, that in 2024, the three most prominent "faces" were Alonso and Lindor and Nimmo, not necessarily in that order.

Posted
Subjective, perhaps, but it can be objectively inferred by who is featured most frequently and most prominently in the team's official promotional materials.
Posted

It can be objectively inferred, however by who is featured most frequently and most prominently in the team's official promotional materials.

 

That's a reasonable measure. Do we know who that was? My guess would be Lindor.

Posted

Here's the NLCS program:


[FIMG=400]https://fanatics.frgimages.com/los-angeles-dodgers-vs-new-york-mets-2024-nlcs-program_ss5_p-202439273+u-cakrlhql2kjqphnqf0kk+v-qiwccfv0hiwhqmpd7vq1.jpg?_hv=2&w=600[/FIMG]


Here's the London series program:


[FIMG=400]https://files.ekmcdn.com/575068/images/new-york-mets-v-philadelphia-phillies-mlb-london-official-programme-june-8th-9th-202-109836-p.jpeg[/FIMG]


I can't find a program cover from the standard regular season home games or the NLDS (or NLWCS) but here is a FOX promo for the NLDS that sort of looks like a program cover:


[FIMG=400]https://foxsports-wordpress-www-prsupports-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/2/2024/10/GZAtnXibAAA9VqW.png[/FIMG]


Neither the yearbook nor the media guide for 2024 feature images of players on the cover.

Posted

And also...


GZAtnXibAAA9VqW.png


WEIRD!


It reminds me of the class pictures from when I was in kindergarten and first grade, when about half of the kids in the photo had their mouths wide open for no obvious reason.

Posted

It's funny how much that HR in Milwaukee changes the perspective. If he doesn't hit that HR, I wonder if there would be this overwhelming support to bring him back.


I like Pete. And I'd even be willing to overpay a bit to bring him back. I know that isn't necessarily the best baseball move, but as a fan, the people who wear the uniform mean something to me. And Pete is a loveable player and a terrific person. And I think there is value to a home grown guy who spends his whole career as a Met.


30/90 is fine. So is 4/100. Opt out after 1 in each of them.


I wouldn't be upset if Stearns took it to 5/125. I just don't think he will.

Posted

I agree with all of the above.


And if Boras is really digging in at $200 million (which has been reported, but I'm skeptical) then Pete will be unsigned until March and he still won't get $200 million.

Posted

By the way, Carlos Baerga is now speculating that the Mets have interest in Anthony Santander. I wasn't really interested in Santander as a Soto alternative, but might be at least a conceptual fit as an Alonso alternative. In many ways, he's the same type of hitter as Pete. Low average, big power hitter. He gets on base less than Pete, but he's a switch hitter, and hit 44 last year.


He's the same age as Pete (both entering their age 30 seasons). Like Pete, he's not great defensively, but has played some 1B in the past. How effectively, I have no idea.


Newsday says the Mets made an offer to Teoscar Hernandez on a 2 year deal, so it looks like Stearns is not shy about bringing in another corner OF and mixing and matching at DH. Signing Santander could mean the Mets move Vientos to 1B, then try to mix in some of the younger players at 2B/3B. Alternatively, Santander could try playing 1B.


I'm skeptical that this is anything more than a backup plan in the event Pete walks, or perhaps it's just leverage to bring down his price.

Posted

How things change. Two or three years ago, you woulda figured that Pete would be in line to score one of the biggest contracts in baseball history.

 

no one thought this. A bad defensive 1Bman entering his age 30 season? His last two have been slightly down, so maybe his projections have taken a slight hit, but mostly his skillset is the same. The Mets didn't even think that back in 2019 or they would've kept him in the minors another few weeks to control 2025.


What surprises me is that so many teams already signed 1B elsewhere. I thought for sure there would be a front office or two that would've identified Mets-specific inefficiencies with Alonso's approach and found projected improvement in their organization. It's not like the bat speed or exit velocity has fallen off, he's just seemingly chosen to hack at different ones the last two years.

Posted

I wouldn't say Pete's a bad first baseman. If anything, I'd

say he's improved with each year. Each and every year. If

I said he was an above average first baseman would anyone

hurl a sneaker at my noggin?

Posted

While he doesn't have elite range, he certainly has the stretch thing down right.

He saved a lot of errors on bad throws last year.

Later

Posted

The Fielding Bible has him at -3 runs saved, tied for 21st among firstbaseman with 500 or more innings. On a runs saved/inning basis, he was 20th among the same set of fielders.


That said, fielding metrics change all the time, often largely obliterating the logic of the previous standards, so it's debatable how meaningful that information is. Or even if it's dead on, it's debatable too how statistically significant one run saved vs. two is when measured against the offensive output of the same guys.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...