Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


Well, that didn't take long.



I suspect he wouldn't have been that much better than Tylor Megill, who'll likely replace him in the rotation. It does put the first dent in the pitching depth, though. So that sucks.


Posted


He can't throw for 6 to 8 weeks and then can start a ST program.

Quintana is available and likely inexpensive.


Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:

Well, that didn't take long.



I suspect he wouldn't have been that much better than Tylor Megill, who'll likely replace him in the rotation.


Or, since they had been lined up to open the season with a six-man rotation, they may well opt not to replace him in the rotation — at least initially — but to instead add a reliever.


Posted


=Cowtipper post_id=185479 time=1739899531 user_id=166]This might win the Mets three or four more games.

Posted


I thought the Montas signing was fraught with risk



I'd like to see Quintana back but I don't see that happening



You don't want to become close to relying on Blackburn or Canning for all that much


Posted


=Cowtipper post_id=185479 time=1739899531 user_id=166]
This might win the Mets three or four more games.

Posted


For whatever it's worth, and it probably isn't much, Pat Ragazzo of SI.com is reporting that an unnamed source says there's mutual interest between the Mets and Quintana.



I hope it's true, but I'll have more confidence when I hear it from someone who's not a suspected AI bot.


Posted


Saw the same report on Metsmerized.com.

Then I noticed they were quoting the same SI source.



Waiting for corroboration.

Later


Posted


I say we bring Quintana back. He'll come cheap and except for that injury in his first year, he pitched pretty well for us. I just don't see Holmes as a starter.


Posted


An analytics view of why they're not pursuing Quintana.

While Quintana's 3.18 second-half ERA was solid, he might have gotten a bit lucky, as evidenced by his 3.89 FIP and his .269 BAbip. While Quintana undoubtedly pitched well, the batted ball luck skewed in his favor making him a possible regression candidate.



Overall, Quintana had a very solid 3.75 ERA in 31 starts and 170.1 innings of work, but he had a 4.56 FIP and a 4.52 xERA. Again, he was good, but might have been a bit lucky too. It's really hard to bet on luck.


https://fansided.com/mets-passing-obvious-starting-pitcher-because-metric-nitpick/partners/36534?fbclid=IwY2xjawIl_Z1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHd-jnlNwGqEWkEwe3Bp2B7DjAPWqg47t_ZRJfdozHHpLMQcrLkoMZ5woDA_aem_q0CQGmGG0zxgf0VZavklgAhttps://fansided.com/mets-passing-obvious-starting-pitcher-because-metric-nitpick/partners/36534?fbclid=IwY2xjawIl_Z1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHd-jnlNwGqEWkEwe3Bp2B7DjAPWqg47t_ZRJfdozHHpLMQcrLkoMZ5woDA_aem_q0CQGmGG0zxgf0VZavklgA



Later


Posted


Lefty Specialist wrote:

Going with Megill, Blackburn or Canning? Now THAT's betting on luck.



This team will hit, but the pitching is going to be ugly.


I don't think it will be ugly. Senga, Manaea, and Peterson are all solid. The other two spots are question marks.


Posted


They might lose on style points (it may at times be ugly) but this isn't Olympic figure skating.

It will be fine as long as they give up one run less than the other team.

I see a lot of 5-4 and 6-5 type games in our future.



Later


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...