Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


More



https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5408834/2024/04/15/minor-league-baseball-team-ownership-diamond-baseball-holdings?source=user-shared-articlehttps://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5408834/2024/04/15/minor-league-baseball-team-ownership-diamond-baseball-holdings?source=user-shared-article





WAPPINGERS FALLS, N.Y. — The artificial turf at Heritage Financial Park is new. So is the right-field wall that opens wide enough for an 18-wheeler to haul concert equipment onto the field. The party deck is sponsored by a brewery that's 10 miles away, giant windows have been installed around the corporate event space overlooking left field, and the renovated home clubhouse, where the Hudson Valley Renegades dress before games, has two indoor batting cages flanked by state-of-the-art data and motion-capture technology.


Posted


If I understand this correctly, this means that the Mets are responsible to pay the players/coaches/training staff, while DBH handles the entertainment side (tickets, marketing, venue, etc)



Then the revenue split must be addressed through the affiliation contract.



So is this done just because big market clubs don't want the hassle of managing the minor league teams?


Posted


They aren't buying teams, they're buying venues.

A definite cost saving move for the major league teams - consolidating some administrative functions while maintaining the control of the baseball stuff. But i hope the centralization of the ticketing doesn't become a fiasco like Ticketmaster.



Later


Posted


So, the ARE buying teams. I'm not sure if I like that or not.

Minor leaguers are covered under the CBA, But if they strike, are they striking against MLB/ owners or this company?

Lotsa' unknown territory here.

Later


Posted


When the Mets bought the Syracuse Chiefs, I was glad because I thought it meant that they'd have a permanent Triple-A home, after the bouncing around that they did after they lost Norfolk. Buffalo, New Orleans, Las Vegas... (All NFL cities, by the way. Huh.) I don't know the details of this new arrangement, but I hope it doesn't mean that the Mets can get bounced from Syracuse in favor of another MLB franchise. I was okay when the Mets were in Buffalo, but Las Vegas was too far away and made call-ups a bit more complicated.


Posted


The idiot tyrant failson fucked up the Tidewater/Norfolk situation after decades of no drama there because nobody, but nobody, could get along with him. In the end, the Katz kids decided that they'd rather sell the Mets than have to work with the jackass.


Posted


=Centerfield post_id=180704 time=1733861720 user_id=65]
If I understand this correctly, this means that the Mets are responsible to pay the players/coaches/training staff, while DBH handles the entertainment side (tickets, marketing, venue, etc)

Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I don't know the details of this new arrangement, but I hope it doesn't mean that the Mets can get bounced from Syracuse in favor of another MLB franchise.


ML clubs sign affiliation deals at each minor league level in two year chunks or in multiples of two. So without any owned franchises going forward it's possible that

a NYM affiliation ends if and when either side sees a situation they like better. Not sure where we currently are in that cycle but the new Syracuse owners would

inherit the current agreement.

The problem with that old AAA situation is that there was one more AAA city in the west than there was a ML city so some eastern team was always losing out in the

affiliate game of musical chairs. For a while it was the Mets once the long stable relationship with Norfolk ended.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:

One owner for 13 AAA franchises is pretty rotten.


Yeah, I didn't think that was allowed.

There have long been individuals/groups owning multiple teams but I always thought it all had to be in different leagues.

Now there are different leagues/divisions within the AAA level but I don't think there are 13 of them.


Posted


The Mets signed like a 25 year ish deal when they agreed to make Syracuse their AAA affiliate. I am pretty sure that is unaffected by this recent maneuver.



I don't know that it will change things much. We attend a dozen or so games per year, and always have, though the games are more fun now that they are Mets games, compared to years of Chiefs/SkyChiefs games as affiliates of Toronto, Washington and probably some other teams I've forgotten.



My biggest fear is that they'll rename the team to something stupid like the Rumble Ponies (owned by DBH). I think you'd have to be pretty stupid to move away from the current name, as there's nothing bigger in all of baseball right now than the New York Fuckin A Mets


Posted


These are not inconsiderable assets. It may not be related that the sale is coming concurrently with baseball's biggest-ever contract, but it sure is interesting.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...