Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Justin time: Verlander to Houston


A Boy Named Seo

Recommended Posts

Posted


Gilbert is #68 on mlb.com's rankings. Two years ago the Mets traded Pete Crow-Armstrong, the #7 prospect who like Gilbert is a AA centerfielder, for a AAAA pitcher and two months of Javier Baez -- after learning that DeGrom was done for the season. I have issues with Eppler, but we've had much worse. I'm kind of impressed by Eppler's willingness to tear down what he built, actually. But he's coming across as being better at selling than at buying, and that's not a good look.


Posted


As it was explained to me today, for luxury tax purposes, any money the Mets send the Astros to pay down Verlander contract is treated identically to having that money on [the Mets] payroll. So if they're sending $54M to HOU as reported, those are taxable payroll dollars for the Mets.


I'm surprised that this needs explaining. Why would it be otherwise?


Posted


Translation: 'Look how many millions they gave me for pitching 16 games/94 innings!!!!!'





OK, he could very well be sincere in his remarks too.

If so it was nice of him to say so publicly.


Posted



As it was explained to me today, for luxury tax purposes, any money the Mets send the Astros to pay down Verlander contract is treated identically to having that money on [the Mets] payroll. So if they're sending $54M to HOU as reported, those are taxable payroll dollars for the Mets.


I'm surprised that this needs explaining. Why would it be otherwise?


I'm guilty of posting it to the forum. I read this https://www.mlb.com/glossary/transactions/competitive-balance-taxhere:


[bLOCKQUOTE]A team's Competitive Balance Tax figure is determined using the average annual value of each player's contract
on the 40-man roster
, plus any additional player benefits.

[/bLOCKQUOTE]



I took that to mean that if Verlander's on the Astros' 40-man, then his salary applies to the Astros' luxury tax ceiling, even if the Mets are actually paying the bulk of his salary.



I read "plus any additional player benefits" to mean "the value of any extra non-monetary benefits a team is giving to players on its current roster" - like if the Mets decided to buy Jacob DeGrom a private plane to fly home to Florida after ballgames to keep him from jumping ship last year - not "the additional money they're paying to players not on the 40-man".



So, that's not the correct reading?


Posted


The money that the Mets sent to the two Texas teams was for players on the 40 man (and 26 man) rosters. The Mets are spending that cash so the expenditure is charged to the Mets for luxury tax purposes.



Here's a question: It looks like the Mets are gonna get a top 10 1st round pick in next Summer's amateur draft. Are they in line for some kind of luxury tax penalty on that purported pick, given the size of their payroll?


Posted


From MLB:



Clubs that are $40 million or more above the threshold shall have their highest selection in the next Rule 4 Draft moved back 10 places unless the pick falls in the top six. In that case, the team will have its second-highest selection moved back 10 places instead.


Posted


It is pretty dumb. If you spend money and suck, well, you should suck harder. And this after they tried to eliminate tanking by taking away the automatic first pick


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...