Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Emergency IGT: NYM@WAS, Game Two, 4/8/22

Edgy MD

By Edgy MD
in Archived Game Threads

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Frayed Knot FCL Mets

Frayed Knot

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


Willets Point wrote:

I don't think I've ever seen a manager initiate a bench-clearing brawl before. Maybe Billy Martin?


And Buck's first managerial mentor was ... ?


Edgy MD FCL Mets

Edgy MD

Site Manager
Posted
  • Author
Posted


By the way ... not that this one would have worked out any other way, but an unintended consequence of the universal DH is going to be more going after the pitcher, knowing that you'll never get him in the batter's box.



More retaliatory throwing at innocent batsmen too.


Edgy MD FCL Mets

Edgy MD

Site Manager
Posted
  • Author
Posted


A Boy Named Seo wrote:

I like the hit/strike-out/reach base probability percentages that Apple TV puts in the corner. It's kind of fun and not obtrusive. It doesn't seem like there's any rhyme or reason as to why they pick one outcome or the other, though. And I'm assuming the 37% hit probability Pete had when it was 2-1 was based on his particular success in those counts, but they've not mentioned it, so I don't know if it's that, or league average, or what.


I fear that this might be something intended to be folded into instant wagering.


Edgy MD FCL Mets

Edgy MD

Site Manager
Posted
  • Author
Posted


=TransMonk post_id=88831 time=1649467675 user_id=71]
I wonder what AppleTV+ would play during a rain delay.

Frayed Knot FCL Mets

Frayed Knot

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


Edgy MD wrote:

A Boy Named Seo wrote:

I like the hit/strike-out/reach base probability percentages that Apple TV puts in the corner. It's kind of fun and not obtrusive. It doesn't seem like there's any rhyme or reason as to why they pick one outcome or the other, though. And I'm assuming the 37% hit probability Pete had when it was 2-1 was based on his particular success in those counts, but they've not mentioned it, so I don't know if it's that, or league average, or what.


I fear that this might be something intended to be folded into instant wagering.


Might?


Willets Point Prep Ball

Willets Point

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:

Willets Point wrote:

I don't think I've ever seen a manager initiate a bench-clearing brawl before. Maybe Billy Martin?


And Buck's first managerial mentor was ... ?


That is a connection I did not make. Thanks!


A Boy Named Seo College Ball

A Boy Named Seo

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:

Edgy MD wrote:

A Boy Named Seo wrote:

I like the hit/strike-out/reach base probability percentages that Apple TV puts in the corner. It's kind of fun and not obtrusive. It doesn't seem like there's any rhyme or reason as to why they pick one outcome or the other, though. And I'm assuming the 37% hit probability Pete had when it was 2-1 was based on his particular success in those counts, but they've not mentioned it, so I don't know if it's that, or league average, or what.


I fear that this might be something intended to be folded into instant wagering.


Might?


I'd wager that you are 100% correct. In addition to outcome probabilities, they've also put the odds for each team to win multiple times. There was no sponsorship with Draft Kings or whatever so I'm waiting for Apple to announce their new baseball betting ring


Edgy MD FCL Mets

Edgy MD

Site Manager
Posted
  • Author
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:

Edgy MD wrote:

A Boy Named Seo wrote:

I like the hit/strike-out/reach base probability percentages that Apple TV puts in the corner. It's kind of fun and not obtrusive. It doesn't seem like there's any rhyme or reason as to why they pick one outcome or the other, though. And I'm assuming the 37% hit probability Pete had when it was 2-1 was based on his particular success in those counts, but they've not mentioned it, so I don't know if it's that, or league average, or what.


I fear that this might be something intended to be folded into instant wagering.


Might?


I think we should set the line at about a 74% probability and start taking some action.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    209
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    Scott Cooper
    Newest Member
    Scott Cooper
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...