Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

IGT 4/27: Mets @ Padres, Dutch Boy vs. Richard


Recommended Posts

Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


La Hollaaaaaa! Let's try and catch some balls, yes?


  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Let's try and catch some balls, yes?

Ces, Flav, Rosie, Obijuan we're talking to you.

Mets RH Jacob deGrom (2-0, 2.53 ERA)
Padres LH Clayton Richard (1-2, 5.67)


Posted


Considering that right now they have two functioning starters, Syndergaard and deGrom, it's really important that the Mets get ahead and win the games they pitch. Otherwise you have to rely on bullpen magic and late-inning heroics, which are nice when they happen, but are not a sustainable game plan.


Posted


Hopefully the Mets mash the Padres this weekend. Rattling off three wins would be really beneficial. And you have to make hay against the teams that carry the adjective of "lowly".


Posted


Lefty Specialist wrote:
Considering that right now they have two functioning starters, Syndergaard and deGrom, it's really important that the Mets get ahead and win the games they pitch. Otherwise you have to rely on bullpen magic and late-inning heroics, which are nice when they happen, but are not a sustainable game plan.


Yup.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


I have more faith in Matz or Wheeler or Gsellman figuring it out than Vargas, who isn't particularly good. Mets lineup is gonna have to pick it up a little bit if we're gonna start relying on a league average type guy like Vargas.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


They're gonna need to pick it up regardless of who you don't like pitching.


Posted


Centerfield wrote:
Lefty Specialist wrote:
Considering that right now they have two functioning starters, Syndergaard and deGrom, it's really important that the Mets get ahead and win the games they pitch. Otherwise you have to rely on bullpen magic and late-inning heroics, which are nice when they happen, but are not a sustainable game plan.


Yup.


How quickly the optimism surrounding this year's starting pitching morphed into the familiar exasperation that surrounded last year's.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


d'Kong76 wrote:
They're gonna need to pick it up regardless of who you don't like pitching.


I like Vargas enough, he's not just very good and has a long history that suggests he's not going to be very good. He could be okay though. and that's fine too, but at this juncture I'd still kinda rather take my chances with the guys with upside.


well if Matz and Wheeler became as good as deGrom and Syndergaard, or even next tier, maybe they don't need to pick it up quite as much?

They should though, because because Frazier and Cabrera can't carry everyone. Conforto's doing okay and Nimmo, Lagares and Flores are doing good in limited time, but the rest of those guys really need to step it up.


Posted


A Boy Named Seo wrote:
Centerfield wrote:
Lefty Specialist wrote:
Considering that right now they have two functioning starters, Syndergaard and deGrom, it's really important that the Mets get ahead and win the games they pitch. Otherwise you have to rely on bullpen magic and late-inning heroics, which are nice when they happen, but are not a sustainable game plan.


Yup.


How quickly the optimism surrounding this year's starting pitching morphed into the familiar exasperation that surrounded last year's.


And the thing is, everyone is healthy. Well, at least when Vargas gets back they will be.

We really needed to get a good, reliable #3.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I'm really not looking for Vargas to be spectacular. I want him to give us seven decent innings.


he's not going to. Vargas isn't getting to the third time through a lot. The Mets are hoping for a lot of 5-6 IP 2-3run games from him.


Guest 41Forever
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I'm really not looking for Vargas to be spectacular. I want him to give us seven decent innings.


he's not going to. Vargas isn't getting to the third time through a lot. The Mets are hoping for a lot of 5-6 IP 2-3run games from him.


Vargas’s 18 wins last year would have led our staff by three wins. And only deGrom had a better ERA. I’ll watch him pitch a little and see how he does before I decide that he sucks.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Yeah as stinky as the relief pitching has been at times, and as bad as the butt-end starters have been, we lose because we're not scoring enough. Conforto, Ces, Bruce all gotta start whacking.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
get out of here with pitcher wins.

Generally speaking, pitchers who win 18 games are a tad better than suck.
It may not be the sexiest roto-sabr-fantasy-projection stat but I think we'd
be hard pressed over the years to find a pitcher with 18 wins or more and
say he flat out sucks(ed). We, meaning the reasonable folks reading this.


Posted


A Boy Named Seo wrote:
How quickly the optimism surrounding this year's starting pitching morphed into the familiar exasperation that surrounded last year's.


Last year they were pitching bad because they were hurt. This year they're pitching bad because, um, they're just bad. They have no excuses (unless they're hurt and not telling anyone, which is a venerable Mets tradition).

But wasting that fantastic start by Thor is just criminal. They have dead spots in their order from 6-9, and they just can't get by with it any more.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


6-8 have been bad, they were talking about it either yesterday or day
before. It's like flushing a third of the game down the terlette.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Just hit, Baby.


JCL wrote:
Yeah as stinky as the relief pitching has been at times, and as bad as the butt-end starters have been, we lose because we're not scoring enough. Conforto, Ces, Bruce all gotta start whacking.


[fimg=400]https://img.discogs.com/HRjwGqXXXMQ7xqSh9K6kYORefw0=/fit-in/585x582/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-542107-1264519399.jpeg.jpg[/fimg]


Posted


I look at the team's stats and I don't have a fucking clue as to how the Mets had the NL's best record for most of the season. It looks now like they're finally regressing to the pumpkins that most analysts predicted they'd be.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


d'Kong76 wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
get out of here with pitcher wins.

Generally speaking, pitchers who win 18 games are a tad better than suck.
It may not be the sexiest roto-sabr-fantasy-projection stat but I think we'd
be hard pressed over the years to find a pitcher with 18 wins or more and
say he flat out sucks(ed). We, meaning the reasonable folks reading this.


okay, but we're not talking generally, we're talking specifically.

flat out sucked? maybe. is not good? not hard. Vargas is a specific example of that. The best pitchers tend to accumulate wins because they're typically on the mound more, regularly, and longer. They also get more vitamin D. It's like looking at beer sales volume and concluding that Citi Field is the most popular bar in NYC.

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Yeah as stinky as the relief pitching has been at times, and as bad as the butt-end starters have been, we lose because we're not scoring enough. Conforto, Ces, Bruce all gotta start whacking.



Conforto's been sorta alright. It's Rosario I'm kinda focusing in on. Gonzalez too, but at least there seems to be some indication of bad luck there ,and he walks some.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I can't remember Conforto's last xbh.


Posted


I tend to wonder if they kept the right rookie from last year. Maybe they should have gone with Smitty and sent Rosey back for more seasoning.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...