John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote: And I don't know why the media continues to paint the Mets' offensive woes as if it was some kind of mystery: It was well-known before the year ever began that they'd be challenged at 4 positions (RF, 2B, 1B, C) potentially, and sure enough they were. Add to it Bay's lost year and Beltran's struggles and its no mystery at all. Nah. For one, this team has been near the top in various offensive categories for years, without much turnover. Last year they even had a really high .AVG. I expected at least this out of 1B, and much much more out of 2B (and if we weren't playing a minor leaguer there, voluntarily, we would get more out of it). I expected a wee bit more out of c, Which was pretty much a disaster last three years. No, I don't see any reason the offense should be this bad. I know Manuel gives away outs with bunts and does inane things, but they should be able to overcome that. It shouldn't be as huge a deal as it is. You can go on and on about "What's Manuel supposed to do?" and "Hitting coaches really don't do much" But neither of them are getting the results they're paid to do or should be expected. It all starts there, on the field. Maximizing the value we have, instead of minimizing it.