Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Ceetar

Grand Central Contributor
  • Posts

    25,313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

New York Mets News, Rumors & Analysis

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospect Rankings

New York Mets Trade & Free Agent Rumors

New York Mets Fan Guides & Resources

2026 New York Mets Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Ceetar

  1. Benjamin Grimm wrote: I have just registered "for the possibility of being selected for the opportunity to purchase tickets, subject to availability, for potential New York Mets 2015 Postseason games at Citi Field." Are there enough qualifiers in that sentence? I guess they're trying to make it as clear as possible that I'm not guaranteed to get tickets for games that may not even be played. sounds funny, but it's actually not redundant. 'possibility' not everyone wins the lottery. 'opportunity' you don't have to buy. 'subject to availability' they're probably only selling like 17 tickets, so even if you win they might be sold out. 'potential' Lottery is for all games any non-eliminated NL team has a chance of playing, whether or not they do.
  2. Centerfield wrote: I just realized he was not called up. So he's not eligible for the post-season right? Why wouldn't the Mets call him up as an option? He could be a spot starter, a long reliever, a seventh inning guy. So basically his contract runs out then he is a free agent right? not on the 40 man. He's eligible though, for being in the organization.
  3. Benjamin Grimm wrote: Maybe because yesterday the Nationals lost a game that they had been expected to lose, but the Mets lost a game they had been expected to win? Just guessing here... yeah, that's probably it. lead didn't change but Nationals strength of schedule dropped and Mets got more difficult.
  4. Well, if games get out of hand a pitcher is ineffective or even just taxed and exits earlier, you stress your bullpen more. Having the deeper safety net there is more valuable in general than the extra hitter (or pinch runner in this case probably) Giants last year Lincecum pitched 1.2 IP. (aside, Madison Bumgarner through 52.2 and no one else through more than 21) Gary Brown got 1 PA. Joaquin Arias got 4. I think the potential for the extra reliever to be more valuable is worth carrying one. But yeah, a whole month worth of games. maybe Nieuwenhuis is hammering the ball or something. Or one of the relievers is pitching lights out and it's obvious you should include him.
  5. just randomly checking the first two teams I picked, Dodgers and Giants, both went with 12 pitchers for the NLDS last season.
  6. Gwreck wrote: They were carrying 7 relievers and 5 starters prior to roster expansion. Why do you think they would now need to carry more relievers in the postseason? 7 relievers is standard. You're losing a starter, so the question becomes do you add a bench guy or a reliever? The Mets starters are good so I suspect they'll go bench guy, but who knows.
  7. I don't know if Uribe and Johnson are locks, or should be. The Mets will go with at least 7 relievers, maybe 8.
  8. MFS62 wrote: Edgy MD wrote: Which pre-season quarter is Niese pitching in? Any pre-season quarter he wants to. But I don't want to see him in the post season. Later I figure he'll turn it back around again before then, but the Mets have a decent amount of ego-crushing difficult decisions mounting in regards to playoff rosters and who's gonna be left out. "Thanks for the two years Bartolo! We'll send you a ring if we win" seem so callous, but also perhaps the right move. I can't see it happening to Niese with his contract, but if he struggles? What if Parnell straightens it out again? Do you leave him off? What if most of his success feels defense-oriented and he hasn't refined his control yet? if he walks 10, Ks 8, but only allows 1 run in 15 innings in September? Great problems to have certainly.
  9. Benjamin Grimm wrote: NL East Tragic Numbers update: Phillies 9, Marlins 11, Braves 13, Nationals 26. Phillies are 10 for the Division, 9 for the WC I believe. Phillies are leading the race to be eliminated from Postseason play.
  10. Zvon wrote: Mets � Willets Point wrote: I'm sorry, but I just can't root for the Cardinals. See, I don't understand this. Of course you can. The Mets need the Cards to beat the Nats. It's as simple as that. Where are your priorities? the best part about the 5.5 (now 6.5) lead is that the Mets don't actually NEED the Cards to beat the Nats.
  11. d'Kong76 wrote: Ceetar wrote: it's not horrible Dude, I know you hit mute on it. Tonight I didn't even get to sit down and watch a quite inning before the baby went to bed, never mind know where the remote is to mute it!
  12. d'Kong76 wrote: That Citi Field restaurant commercial that SNY seemingly airs a dozen times an evening makes me want to poke my eyes and ears out with my elbows. it's not horrible, but they didn't start airing it until after they picked a winner! Edgy MD wrote: You guys getting those Draft Kings ads. Bleh. All season everywhere. MLB affiliate or whatever. I put a couple bucks in. Kinda fun but it's really just gambling. BS that this is legal and not poker (well, in other states)
  13. yay leads!
  14. used to throw it as a starter and apparently has been practicing it all year, just not in games. 7IP for Harvey and deGrom 2IP for Familia should probably be the ideal in the critical games.
  15. Edgy MD wrote: Yes, thank you. I wrote that on Saturday, and he was DL'd yesterday. yup, and gets a decent paycheck from it as I understand it.
  16. d'Kong76 wrote: Wonder where he stands on dinosaurs? Funny, the dino thing came up yesterday or day before on the radio broadcast. Cause Carl Everett was one of the trivia answers for 'players who played 200 games for both Sox and Mets'
  17. Phillies E# is 12. They're currently tied with the Marlins on pace to be the first NL team eliminated from the postseason.
  18. Edgy MD wrote: Neither is Young or Stauffer. There's always a way to make room. Trying to pass Monell or Tovar through waivers is one quick way. Or two, in fact. Tovar has been 60 day DLd.
  19. 28
  20. Mets probably have 2-3 more in them tonight I figure.
  21. larry wrote: �This guy was wearing a split jersey, half Yankees, half Mets, and a split hat, half Yankees, half Mets, and he started in on me as we were leaving the field, saying what the Yankees were going to do to us in the World Series,� Jones said. �I was like, �Come on bro, pick a side.� I was a punk kid, I didn�t know better. That�s when I said it.� http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/sports/baseball/19chipper.html?_r=CranePoolForum
  22. Gwreck wrote: he was never obnoxious, never rude Not exactly. "Take the two series between the teams in September 1999. In the first, Jones combined for four home runs and seven RBI to lead the Braves to a sweep in Atlanta. In the second, the Braves won two out of three at Shea Stadium, seemingly ending the Mets' playoff hopes. Jones infamously said afterward: 'Now all the Mets fans can go home and put their Yankee stuff on.'" Source: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304724404577297924170173092 Supposedly he was referencing one of those idiots that was wearing one of those stupid half-Mets half-Yankees jerseys
  23. even dumber. those scanners probably use slightly different technology that makes it easier I guess? (from what I understand, LED versus laser scanner)
  24. Mets � Willets Point wrote: I selected the smartphone tickets for the game I went to in April because it would be "faster." Instead, the ticket taker had to scan my phone, print out a ticket, and then scan that ticket. And repeat four times, because there were five of us. It was ridonculous. So much for technology. as usual, this is at least partly a 'PEBKAC' (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) error. You CAN scan the phone but likely due to the refraction through the glass screen the margin for error is small and most people (you scan yourself at many of the turnstiles) give up before adjusting the phone/angle/distance correctly.
  25. LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: Print. Met gatestaff seem to have intermittent problems with sunny-afternoon scanning of smartphone screens, in my experience. yeah. I mean, technically as long as it's a barcode you can scan it at the gate, as you've been able to do for years and years, (turn the brightness down on the screen helps I think) but I can be flighty and they don't really guarantee it I don't think unless you're using the iPhone iPassport app or whatever that's called.
×
×
  • Create New...