Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

metsmarathon

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,197

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

New York Mets Videos

2026 New York Mets Top Prospects Ranking

New York Mets Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

The New York Mets Players Project

2026 New York Mets Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by metsmarathon

  1. metsmarathon
    the biggest problem with weekly is that it locks in on monday morning. so if you don't get to it over the weekend, you're SOL. in the daily leagues that i play in, i do most of my rostering on monday mornings, so that always would screw up my own personal workings, and i seem very slow to adapt. i vote daily. (with inning cap)
  2. metsmarathon
    um, i only saw three of 2006's theatrical releases the best of them was cars the worst of them was happy feet and the movie i saw in an airplane was mission impossible iii i need to get out more.
  3. metsmarathon
    i wish these rankings were as easy as calculus!
  4. metsmarathon
    i feel compulsed to attempt to do it quantifiably, even if the method for quantification is flawed. especially since i started out the whole process using some inherently flawed quantification method. i must compound the mistake - i simply must! also, it lets me, presumably, go back in and reevaluate my mthodologies a little easier than a subjective ranking would.
  5. metsmarathon
    i was toying originally with three and five, but then that'd almost force me to go with the world series being 10 times as important as the regular season, and that's a bit much. the postseason would then be worth between 9+20+40 = 69 games minimum and 15+35+70 = 120 games maximum. with my 2, 3, 5 multipliers, it works out instead to 6+12+20 = 38 games minimum to 10+21+35 = 66 games maximum. is that right? i dunno. but postseason games are more important, so i'm going with it! there's still a good argument that i've got oliver too high, and maybe the more meaningful relievers too low. i'll run an excursion wherein saves and holds are granted more points, and see what happens!
  6. metsmarathon
    updated, in such a fashion as to rectify my voting silliness, as well as to account for the post season. for the record, i counted NLDS games as twice as important as regular season games, and NLCS games as thrice as important. results are as shown below. 30 Beltran 29 Reyes 28 Delgado 27 Wright 26 Glavine 25 LoDuca 24 Valentin 23 Chavez 22 Floyd 21 Martinez 20 Maine 19 Wagner 18 OHernandez 17 Oliver 16 Bradford 15 Heilman 14 Feliciano 13 Trachsel 12 Nady 11 Sanchez 10 Perez 9 Woodward 8 Green 7 Mota 6 Milledge 5 Franco 4 Bannister 3 Rhernandez 2 Castro 1 Bell
  7. metsmarathon
    Frayed Knot wrote: Yo marathon, are you willing to defend; - Oliver above Wagner (4 slots), Heilman (6), Sanchez (7), Feliciano (10) & Bradford(11)???? - Trachsel over all of the above plus LoDuca, Valentin & Maine??? - Votes for Bell, Williams & Ring, but none for Green, Mota & Franco??? - Soler above Bradford & Feliciano??? maybe... its all based on my schaeffer voting. are you trying to imply that there's a flaw with how i voted! what nerve! of, and i forgot to include the postseason. hee. i'll take a look at what i've done here. i'm not sure my next tabulation won't raise equally many problems...
  8. metsmarathon
    and here's another chart that combines win shares and wins above replacement, averaged together, sorta. i divided win shares by three, and then averaged that with WARP3, and ranked based on that average. feel free to ignore it if you like - its more for informational purposes than anything. rank player WARP3 WS/3 30 Beltran 11.8 12.7 29 Reyes 10.2 10.7 28 Wright 7.2 9.7 27 Glavine 6.2 8.0 26 Delgado 6.8 5.3 25 Martinez 4.9 5.7 24 Ohernandez 6.5 4.0 23 Trachsel 5.6 4.3 22 Valentin 4.6 4.7 21 Maine 3.8 2.7 20 Oliver 3.3 2.7 19 LoDuca 3.3 2.0 18 Chavez 2.8 2.3 17 Floyd 2.1 3.0 16 Wagner 3 2.0 15 Nady 2.2 2.7 14 Heilman 2.5 2.0 13 Feliciano 2.8 1.7 12 Bannister 2.4 2.0 11 Soler 2.5 1.7 10 Sanchez 1.7 1.0 9 Bradford 1.6 1.0 8 Perez 1.4 0.7 7 Woodward 1 1.0 6 Milledge 0.5 1.3 5 Bell 0.6 1.0 4 Williams 0.7 0.7 3 Rhernandez 0.5 0.7 2 Castro 0.5 0.3 1 Ring 0.5 0.3
  9. metsmarathon
    here's my list, based on my own schaeffer voting: 30 Beltran 29 Reyes 28 Wright 27 Glavine 26 Delgado 25 Martinez 24 Ohernandez 23 Trachsel 22 Valentin 21 Maine 20 Oliver 19 LoDuca 18 Chavez 17 Floyd 16 Wagner 15 Nady 14 Heilman 13 Feliciano 12 Bannister 11 Soler 10 Sanchez 9 Bradford 8 Perez 7 Woodward 6 Milledge 5 Bell 4 Williams 3 Rhernandez 2 Castro 1 Ring
  10. metsmarathon
    edgy, you might want to double check your chart. williams comes in at 7 high, not 4. pedro comes in at 22 high, 15 low, not 23/14. i'm sure there are others too. hey, i should cobble together a list!
  11. metsmarathon
    it weirds me out a bunch of times, but i keep on liking it enough for four leg lamps worth. the next vote will break the five-way tie!
  12. metsmarathon
    i'll play again, and hopefully not suck and not trade really good secondbasemen for average pitching.
×
×
  • Create New...