12:55 Marcus: Player valuation is a fraudulent. nerd-bases entity. What's Cody Ross' player valuation, pal? i wonder... what is cody ross' player valuation... i mean, if player valuation were fraudulent, i would expect to see something in his player valuation that a) does not make his postseason look like a tremendous fluke, or would not make his postseason look tremendous. i wonder what we would find... lets see... so, he's had three full seasons, two partial seasons, and two tiny stints. in 2007, he actually had an OPS of 1.064 in 66 games with the marlins. but since then, his OPS has trended steadily downward, from 0.804 to 0.790 to finally 0.735 this year. so i guess you could say that he's capable of showing power, and might even be capable of doing it for a shorter period of time, but given a larger sample size, you're going to see a lot of poor production mixed in with the good. he had a tremendous may '08 with 10 homers in 18 games, and has also had a few months with 5 or 6 homers. most had fewer. so you see potential streakiness there as well. but with no predictability. he has good months. he has a lot more bad months. so the postseason looks flukey and unexpected, though potentially unsurprising based on a look at his valuation. but i guess since we'd be looking at valuation, we should also look at how we'd value his postseason. sure, it doesn't show up in traditional player valuation, because unlike football, and possibly basketball, (i could be wrong about those two sports, btw) postseason doesn't count towards your stat line in baseball. babe ruth had 714 homers in the regular season. when we consider the most valuable player award, we look at the regular season. well, some of us look at september, in pennant races, on teams with mostly mediocre talent save one or two really good players. but i digress. we generally don't try to do postseason valuation because a) its a tiny sample size that's inconsistent between even those lucky few players who participate, and its just meaningless and dumb. but whatever. cody ross. how would we value his postseason? well, he's got an OPS of 1.184. that's generally valued favorably. in fact, that's better than what albert pujols puts up in a given season. the closest he came was 1.114. and he won the mvp that season, and most likely deserved it. pujols' valuation that season was a shade under 10 WAR. rogers hornsby almost had a year with as good an OPS in 1922. that's a 10.7 WAR year, tho he took a hit for defense. so year, were we to consider cody ross's postseason performance and scaled it up to make a valuation on it in the same context of a regular season, we'd pretty much value him favorably. but i guess that's nerd-speak for "my eyes tell me he's good; i have no need for my brain."