Edgy MD wrote: metirish wrote: But would Wally make the Baxter's, the Recker's better players? I don't know. But I have little doubt that some managers get more from some players than others do. I'm guessing Wally would tell them to send the Baxters and Reckers to Las Vegas. I don't see the value of firing Terry and bringing in Wally right now. We all knew from the git-go that this team was going to suck this year- there were just too many holes. No outfield. 40% of a starting pitching staff. Relievers born during the Nixon Administration. Two closers, one who can't pitch, and um, one who can't pitch. Suspect defense. These are not the building blocks of a successful year. The past few years, this team has had similar sorts of holes and they've been able to kind of keep it together until the All-Star break, when someone sneezes and the house of cards collapses. It's just happening earlier this year. In a way, that's good; it's three fewer months when Jeff Wilpon can delude himself that he can win without spending any money. Wally, bless his little fireplug of a soul, wouldn't make enough of a difference to matter. He can't play the outfield or pitch seven solid innings (and even if he could, the bullpen would blow it). It's better for all concerned to let the detritus sort itself out, for the bottom to be scraped, for warm July nights of under 10,000 at the ballpark to be displayed for the Wilpons to see. If I'm Backman, I don't want to walk into that situation. I'd rather walk in with a fresh start in 2014 and hopefully a little more money to be spent on players, some of which he's helped mold, and some of which he has input on selecting. Now, if it's offered, Backman will take the job. He's consumed with managing in the majors after the D-Backs snatched it away from him a few years ago. He might make a small difference, but not enough to remotely turn this team around this year.