One of the problems in trying to evaluate Eppler's tenure in Queens is that it's hard to know how many decisions were made over his head, ie: by Cohen. It's obvious that the Correa thing was a virtual Stevie solo gig. I mean, yeah, that deal never actually was made, but was Eppler even in the loop? Verlander talked about how talking to Steve is what sold him on the Mets but was Steve there to just seal the deal or was that a soup-to-nuts situation also? Ditto the Scherzer negotiations a year earlier. And when the decision was made to break the whole thing down at the deadline, was Eppler part of that decision or was it made for him and he was just then put in charge of making the best deals out of moves that were essentially dictated to him? Maybe Eppler, like Ng earlier this week, didn't like a situation where they had not just one person over him but more than occasionally two.