We all know that fans are going to bitch about awards voting in almost every category every year, and are of course going to direct that ire towards the writers, usually with the complaint that voting should be done by baseball people. But the thing about the GG awards in particular is that those are the ones which have long been voted on by managers and coaches (although these days there's also a 30% statistical element to them) and yet are the ones which they seem to get wrong more than any other (Kate Upton's colorful comments on the AL CY voting a few years back notwithstanding). Mostly it seems like it's the one that's mostly a reputation vote (can't just out-point the champ, you've gotta knock him out to dethrone him). And it would be nice if they took showing up every day into consideration. As mentioned above, Betts is on the RF list despite playing less than 2/3 of his games there, Kim at 2B even fewer, and Rizzo at 1B in the AL, while a wonderful defensive player, played less than 100 G total (some at DH). All of which recalls the ultimate in bad voting, the year where Rafael Palmiero won a GG at 1B despite playing all by 20-some games at DH. That's an amazing amount of disagreement. I find the concept amazingly disagreeable.