LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote: Here's where you say, "Murphy is our second baseman. We have no plans to trade him this offseason." And then wink, like, so hard you go Popeye for a day or two from the aftereffects. You don't want to Ike your trading leverage like last time. Murphy is what he is, and at absolute best maybe a little more, and he'll begin to get increasingly expensive (and approach decline) really soon. It's not just the ceiling of Flores that makes this doable-- we've also got the floor of a good-glove, on-base-y Herrera. Yup. I know this maybe somewhat reactionary, but I think I am willing to go into next year with Flores, Matt Reynolds and Tejada at SS. There are only a few difference makers at SS around, and I don't think any are available (except maybe Hanley, but there is a lot of baggage there). If I had to make a choice, I'd go with the in-house candidates at SS and go all in on a stud LF. Of course, I'd love for the Mets to one day realize they are a big market team, and sign Hanley, sign the Cuban LF guy, then win the World Series.