meh, he's one of the best hitters on the team and Smith is a prospect. He could still flame out for all we know. You could push for the DH for the other 150 games, juggle the position, play Duda in RF sometimes since the Mets don't seem to care about defense anyway. I mean, just handing the job to a prospect with less than two months of major league experience shouldn't ever be a given. Duda has a .911 OPS. Smith is cheap, and young, and will play better defense, but .900 OPS guys don't just fall out of a tree. So what's the point here, that we should keep Duda for QO money (probably north of $18 mil) or resign him to a multi-year deal at market prices AND try to work Smith in at the same time even though they both swing lefty and are limited to the same position on the field? That's nuts folks. Duda will be 32 next season and has a career 800 OPS. And even if you want to look at only 2016-17 and claim that 900 is now his new normal, while also ignoring that those years totaled less than a full season's worth of ABs (barely over 400) due to injuries, AND that you expect him to keep duplicating that as he turns 32, 33, 34 - it means you're content to see the 22 y/o Smith sit around for the occasional PH appearance and/or wait in Vegas for another injury. If you're that intent on keeping Duda then you need to deal Smith off in some sort of 'challenge trade' for a prospect at a different position; this has to be an either/or proposition. And as long as you keep in mind that a 1B prospect will probably get you a lesser prospect at any other position, you're free to submit your WATPs for Smith anytime. Will Smith ultimately be the better player? I have no idea but we're going to need to find out at some point and if that time is not when the existing guy's contract is up and the replacement is hitting .340 in AAA I'm not sure there ever will be a time. Ultimately I'm going to bet on the guy who's going to be 22-27 in the next five years over the one going to be 32-37, but that's just me. My quote above was more or less in response to this: As much as we may have liked Lucas he had to go and it makes zero sense to bring him back. I don't think it makes zero sense. And I know you didn't mean it literally, but I don't think the answer is as clear cut you suggest. In the end, all things considered, I think you have to try out Dominic Smith, but this is the riskier move for a team trying to win it all next year. Smith looks like a great fielder, a good hitter and is cheap, allowing us to use money elsewhere, but he will most likely be an offensive downgrade from Duda for 2018. And Duda has a few years left of his prime, so maybe for the next 2-3 years as well. Gun to my head, I think you make this move. Smith is "ready", as far as we can tell, and a high-average, contact hitting doubles machine that sprays the ball might be exactly what this team needs. But if they re-signed Duda, and traded Smith for a 2B/CF version of Smith, or used him as part of a package to get that, then I could see the value in that as well. I don't know. Maybe I'm just attached to the guy. Or I'm afraid of getting burnt. I just have this sinking feeling he's going to hit 75 HR's next year for someone else. Letting Murphy walk and replacing him with Neil Walker made a lot of sense at the time too.