I think I'm closer to FK than what the Mets have done. And although I agree that "HOF with Mets Hat" is too strict, it's closer than whatever they're doing now. I think it has to be something along the lines of: 1. Elite performance for a significant portion of time. 2. Long tenure as a Met 3. Must be associated with the Mets more than any other team (at the very least, can't be more associated with another club than the Mets) So going through the retired numbers: 1. Casey Stengel. #37. No. I mean, why are we retiring a manager's number. This is dumb. 2. Gil Hodges. #14. No. See above. 3. Tom Seaver. #41. Yes. Duh. 4. Jackie Robinson. #42. Find another way to honor him. Making all clubs retire his number is dumb. And seems forced. 5. Mike Piazza. #31. Yes. It's a close call on criteria 3. The Dodgers are close, but I say he's more Met than Dodger. 6. Jerry Koosman. #36. No. I never saw him play, but I don't think you can really say he was elite, and not for a significant portion of the time. 7. Keith Hernandez. #17. No. Spent more years with the Cardinals, won his MVP with the Cardinals, better overall numbers with the Cardinals. I mean, we love him. But as a player, he's more St. Louis than NY. 8. Willie Mays. #24. I mean, come on. 9. Dwight Gooden. #16. Yes. He didn't stay elite as long as we would have liked, but has earned it. 10. Darryl Strawberry. #18. Yes. 11. David Wright. #5. Yes. My wall: 41 31 16 18 5 15 Including 24 basically makes this honor meaningless.