smg58 wrote: It wasn't that long ago that teams could win 100 games and not have any postseason. Divisions are perceived as building rivalries, which is perceived as being good for fan interest, so I don't see that changing. The current wildcard format was put in so that winning the division became more meaningful (i.e., the Sox sweeping the Yankees would be a lot less of a big deal in the previous format than it currently is). I didn't think anybody who isn't a Yankee fan thinks the current system is unfair, and of course Yankee fans wouldn't feel that way at all if they were the ones pulling away. At any rate, it would serve the best interests of competitive balance (and, of course, humanity in general) if the Yankees played only one playoff game. I'm on board with this too. I think winning your division has been and always should be the central aim of the regular season, and this current system fosters it. Don't want to play a 1 game playoff? Then win your division. That being said, I do understand where the Red Sox fan feels shafted. In the past 20 seasons, Boston has won 90+ games 14 times, and has only 5 division titles to show for it. People talk about re-alignment. And let me say, thank god these two teams play in the AL. If the Mets shared a division with these two teams they would never win it. I mean, they don't win very often now as it is, but with these two powerhouses, I think you could kiss any wildcard goodbye as well.