If I break it down pitcher v. pitcher, OFer v. OFer, I get this: I haven't seen anything from Mike Pelphrey to understand why scouts went gaga over the guy in college. It seems like even in Triple A he had way too high pitch counts too early in games. He could very well turn out to be a good pitcher, but have no faith he will ever become an ace. Humber is still a work in progress, or at least I've only seen enough to believe he's a work in progress. Not enough of a track record to go on, which makes me more leery of letting him go. Using the hideous Mike and the Mad Dog choice, "gun to my head," I think Humber could be better. So I say keep him. Milledge has shown flashes in small doses. I still think he's young enough and good enough to one day be a good offensive player. Clearly, he's not there, though, and where once he was the Mets top chip to land guys like Roy Oswalt, now we hear names like Joe Blanton. Gomez looks like he will be a good player, but he has a long way to go at the plate to get there. I think Gomez might also bring a better return. I say keep Milledge because I believe right now he can be an everyday player. We might not be able to say that about Gomez until 2009.