NY Times wrote: Heilman is clearly the best option, but the Mets do not want to tinker with the majors' best relief corps. Whoa, are we really sure about this? I know Heilman wants to start, and I'm sure player motivation counts for something, but I'm not entirely convinced that his history supports this claim. I know Aaron had an excellent winter and spring, but his major league performances seem to highly support that he's at his best as a reliever.