="Nymr83"]Wright's homer made it 1-0, Easley's homer took it from 4-2 to 5-2, the fact that the brewers later made it 5-4 doesnt change the relative value of the homers at the time they were hit. Thanks, but I was at the game to see it myself. My point -- perhaps not quite so well explained -- is that Easley's total contributions out numbered Wright's. Easley rally-extending single (not his fault that the guys behind him couldn't get it done) in addition to his homer was worth more than what Wright did. Sure, Wright's homer alone was worth more than Easley's. But an insurance run homer is still huge.