Gwreck

I believe Santana earned that right after the 2012 season (he was hurt and never pitched again in the majors, of course) but he was under Mets control through 2013. And before Beltran: Trachsel, 2006 Piazza, 2003 John Franco, circa 1995

The full article had the arguments built out a lot more, but basically it came down to: -the internal options to replace Diaz aren’t nearly as good -external options are either several years older (Robert Suarez, Rasiel Iglesias) or have had some recent challenging times in New York (Devin Williams, Ryan Helsley) and thus probably unlikely to sign with the Mets. -this is the sort of player a team like the Mets should sign given their financial advantage. -Even if Diaz ages poorly and loses the closer role by the end of the contract, he can still be a useful part of the bullpen and wouldn’t just be dead space on the roster. I think all of these are good points, but I also agree with The Hot Corner’s analysis: the Mets would have been happy for Diaz to not opt-out and stay for 2 more years. Giving Diaz what is effectively a 2 or 3 year extension isn’t exactly outrageous, and we know Uncle Stevie’s got the cash.

Unlike several of the recent retirements, a retirement for Beltran’s number would be appropriate if/when he is elected to the Hall of Fame. The cynical among us would note that occasion would provide the opportunity for a separate celebration/increased ticket draw day. Which, I recall, is what happened with Piazza — he was inducted into the Mets HOF a couple years before his MLB HOF induction (after which his number was retired).

I’ll go a step further and say that Mazzilli is both *not* worthy and the weakest player inductee into the Mets HOF. The only retired-but-not-yet-inducted players I’d consider for the Mets HOF are: Reyes (a complicated case) and John Stearns. (Obviously deGrom, Alonso, Lindor, and Nimmo will all get in after their careers are over).

Tyrone Taylor.

And he plays a multitude of positions. Every year since about 2020 I’ve been of the opinion that the Mets would be well served by not even factoring McNeil in the first instance when trying to fill out a lineup, knowing that he’ll get 700 PAs anyway because there’s always slumps/injuries/etc. and he can be fit in to play almost anywhere.

Wasn’t the 2018 Supreme Court case which opened Pandora’s box a suit by New Jersey against MLB (and the other major leagues plus the NCAA)? I’m fully aware that MLB’s stance has changed somewhat after the Supreme Court decided Murphy but MLB was not on the side of legalizing betting nationwide in the first instance. MLB seeking to get their share of the money once that change in the law occured is…not exactly indefensible. And, while it’s a bit beside the point, didn’t California Proposition 27 get defeated by something like a 4-to-1 margin?

Agreed 100%. But…while that may make MLB hypocritical if it was going to now complain about the negative effects of gambling…I’m not as sure that MLB owns the blame for this incident. Did they actively try to have the laws changed to legalize the gambling? Not really. Were there scandals involving players when you could only legally gamble in NV? Yes. Does MLB have the harshest possible penalty (lifetime ban) for gambling infractions? It does. Should gambling on sports be illegal? Ehhhh…

I am not a Manfred fan here (and he’s made some dumb comments about gambling recently) but where is it that MLB ignored this issue? The reporting is that they (1) suspended the pitchers while an investigation was pending (2) and shared information with the prosecutors. That sure seems like what they’re supposed to do, no?

Key positives: -Massive infusion of resources for on-field talent. This is the #1 responsibility of an owner (willingness/ability to spend money to make team competitive) and ownership is best-in-class on this point. -Stadium upgrades. Fixing the scoreboard was the single most important change that could have been made to Citi Field and it is outstanding. -Improvements in scouting, player development, and analytics. Doesn’t get as much attention but these have all been built out, expanded, and/or upgraded over the last few years. -Reputation and impression of organization. Players want to come to NY, the organization is viewed as a favorable place to work, etc. Major PR gaffes/debacles have been significantly reduced. Key negatives: -Field manager turnover. In fairness, Rojas was inherited, but the Buck Showalter experiment and dismissal was messy. -Waiting for Stearns to become available left the GM/baseball operations leadership in flux for a couple years. Mixed: -Games won/time in first place in the standings has improved significantly…but final position and playoff outcomes have underwhelmed. Too soon to tell: -Revamping player development, scouting, drafting, etc. is a long-term process and we won’t know how successful it’s been for years down the road. -Stearns. Obviously way too soon to fully know how effective he will be as POBO. Some positives but also coming up short in 2025 was problematic.

Could you be more specific as to your definition of “lofty position?” I think that’s a pretty optimistic look at the team currently and an even more optimistic assessment of the unproven players in the minors. The Lindor-Alonso-Nimmo-McNeil-Diaz core of the past 5 years has zero division titles and one once got to 90 wins…

Could you be more specific as to your definition of “lofty position?”

Britton did a piece a few weeks back about what the payroll would look like at $244 million (below luxury tax threshold), $284 million (below penalty level where draft position is lived back) and at $340 million. https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6695773/2025/10/07/new-york-mets-roster-offseason-budget/ Takeaway: He had $340M as a level at which the Mets could (1) retain Alonso and Diaz; (2) sign a Shane Bieber or Michael King as a starter; (3) add a couple luxury bullpen arms (Shelby Miller, Brad Keller). At the $340M level though, that’s still putting McNeil at 2B, Baty at 3B, Vientos at DH, and Taylor in CF as part of the everyday starting lineup (under the theory that Benge and Williams are likely to help later in the year, but won’t be on the opening day roster).

I believe it’s announced closer to the vote. An additional wrinkle is that each committee member can only vote for 3 players. By way of reference, the “classic era” committee that elected Allen and Parker was: Hall of Fame Players (5): Paul Molitor, Eddie Murray, Tony Perez, Lee Smith, Ozzie Smith Hall of Fame Managers (1): Joe Torre Executives (5): Sandy Alderson, Terry McGuirk, Dayton Moore, Arte Moreno, Brian Sabean Media/Historians (5): Bob Elliott, Leslie Heaphy, Steve Hirdt, Dick Kaegel and Larry Lester.

8 candidates announced for the ballot: Barry Bonds Roger Clemens Carlos Delgado Jeff Kent Don Mattingly Dale Murphy Gary Sheffield Fernando Valenzuela Ballot was selected by 11-member panel of baseball historians. A 16-member committee (composition not yet announced) will meet in December. 12 votes needed for election. Fewer than 5 votes means a candidate is ineligible for the next Contemporary Era ballot in 2029. Garnering fewer than 5 votes on two Contemporary Era Ballots (e.g., if they return in 2032 and again get <5 votes again) they are ineligible for further HOF consideration.

3 AM I think? Ohtani was walked intentionally 5x (every time he came up in extras).

=metirish post_id=207389 time=1761645400 user_id=72] Dodgers walk it off on a Freeman HR in the 18th , 6 hours 39 minutes, surely no one here stayed up?

Eric Lauer, Toronto's 8th pitcher: 4.2 innings, 0 runs, 2 hits, 2 Ks, 4 walks (3 were intentional).

Lest it be lost to history, Will Smith led off the bottom of the 14th and his plate appearance ended with him starting out at the outfield as he flipped his bat. Problem is that it was caught on the warning track. To be clear, I generally like home run celebrations…but, you know, you'd better be sure it's actually a home run, pal.

Once again this game proves, if nothing else, how awful the free runner is in extras.

Mets had 147 steals (5th most in MLB) and a ridiculous 89% success rate. Obviously that’s not *all* due to Richardson but hard to say he didn’t significantly help the team be better.

All of those uniforms — other than the classic white with blue pinstripes — are ghastly.

When I watch the Jonas Brothers' fake live performance, all I can think of is how that space could instead have been used to sell standing room tickets to actual Blue Jay fans instead.

=Nyer_In_Maryland post_id=207282 time=1761418731 user_id=274]Libtards

No need for the investigation, Carter already confirmed on Tuesday that he'll be there this weekend and throwing out a first pitch. https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/columnist/bob-nightengale/2025/10/21/joe-carter-home-run-blue-jays-world-series/86811611007/https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/columnist/bob-nightengale/2025/10/21/joe-carter-home-run-blue-jays-world-series/86811611007/