Pettite (34 years old on opening day) 2005- 17-9, 222.3 IP, 171 K, 41bb, 174 ERA+ 2006- 14-13, 214.3 IP, 178 K, 70bb, 108 ERA+ Zito (28yo) 2005- 14-13, 228.3 IP, 171 K, 89bb, 116 ERA+ 2006- 16-10, 221.0 IP, 151 K, 99bb, 116 ERA+ Schmidt (34yo) 2005- 12-7,172.0 IP,165 K, 85bb, 94 ERA+ 2006- 11-9, 213.0 IP,180 K, 80bb, 125 ERA+ Pettite suddenly started walking people last year, though still not at an alarming rate. I think they're all pretty equivalent. If you've gotta sign one of them long term Zito is the obvious choicebecause of age, but for 3 years Schmidt was a steal as was Pettite for 1 + the option. All things considered if I were the Mets I'd have matched the offer to Schmidt or the one to Pettite (though I'd have to think he was only really looking at the Yankees and Astros) and told Boras to run up Zito's price on someone else.