Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted


SNY broadcast, 4:05 start, deGrom vs. Gio Gonzalez.

Fboy and I made up a fun game where we switch the first letter sounds of the players' first and last names to give them funny monikers, like "Flilmer Worres" and "Hatt Marvey" and "Grurtis Canderson."

You try to say Grurtis without laughing, I dare ya.


Guest cooby
Guests
Posted


Hatt Marvey is pretty good too


Posted


That Álex Torres sure had a hatt marvey. I'll say that much.

Let's home Recty Rollins has a full roster to work with.


Posted


Shouldn't that be Kerry Tollins?
Reminds me of the time we decided that whenever Chad Bradford had a bad day it was actually the fault of his evil twin Brad Chadford


Well, whatever it should be, here the lineup he's putting out there today:

LAGARES - CF
CONFORTO - LF
CABRERA - SS
BRUCE - 1B
WALKER - 2B
GRANDERSON - RF
R RIVERA - 3B
TJ RIVERA - C
deGROM - P


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Ashie62 wrote:
T.J is catching?


Nah. TJ has 3rd, Rene catching.

Raining lightly off & on.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


It is getting difficult to watch. Thank God for Muffy and his comic relief.

[tweet]

[/tweet]


Posted


Good thing we wore Gio out with all those pitches in the 1st inning.


Meanwhile, against deGrom, the Nats are either making zero contact or hard contact.
Aside from the Murphy & Weiters pop-ups to end the top 6th, they've either been smoking balls or striking out. Tough to explain that.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Grandy flashing some leather. Great catch.

[tweet:3l3hodis]

[/tweet:3l3hodis]


Old-Timey Member
Posted


An Eaton walk and a Turner single ends Jacob's day.
deGrom out, Edgin in.

1st & 2nd, 2 out, 6th. Bryce up.

deGrom with 6 walks today, 10 Ks. Strange day for the deGrominator.


Posted


I'd reject this review - but I'd reject all of these microscopic reviews just to keep the managers from nit-picking.


... but the umps in Chelsea don't agree


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
I'd reject this review - but I'd reject all of these microscopic reviews just to keep the managers from nit-picking.


... but the umps in Chelsea don't agree


Amazin'. I thought he was safe for sure.


Posted


Zvon wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
I'd reject this review - but I'd reject all of these microscopic reviews just to keep the managers from nit-picking.


... but the umps in Chelsea don't agree


Amazin'. I thought he was safe for sure.


I couldn't tell whether he was safe or out and if that's the case you stick with the call on the field every time.
Then, if you do that, it cuts the number of challenges in half as managers would only go after the more obvious missed calls which is what the replay rule was designed to be in the first place.


Posted


Meanwhile, the Nats bullpen came into this series with an ERA north of 5.00 and WHIP of nearly 1.5 ... but we haven't gotten a hit off them in six innings so far.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...