Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Can't believe it took this long-- and these circumstances-- for Robles to get back into a game. Whether it's the motion, or the quick-pitching, or the stuff... batters just look so much less comfortable against him than they have for the last month against Clippard or Reed.


  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


These first two games would have been at Citi Field if Frankie Rodriguez not screwed up the All-Star Game.

Meanwhile, Lucas wearing down Cueto.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Good news: Duda's taking good at-bats.
Bad news: nobody else is.


Posted


Man, it's so refreshing to see a team that swings so aggressively and makes such consistent contact.

At least, it would be refreshing if they weren't throwing acid into my dreaming eyes.


Posted


Edgy MD wrote:
Man, it's so refreshing to see a team that swings so aggressively and makes such consistent contact.

At least, it would be refreshing if they weren't throwing acid into my dreaming eyes.

That's it... they just. Hit. Everything. And inevitably, those are going to start falling. That's what happened to deGrom there; he couldn't put anybody away, which is what he's done all season. Same problem Harvey had.


Posted


DeGrom also got four scoreless innings to open the game with no hits through three...and then started missing over the plate in the fifth.

Don't let Harold Reynolds brainwash you.

Yesterday they were beat until Familia did one bad pitch.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Harold Reynolds talking at length about the challenge-- "the biggest thing" about the role-- in pitching back-to-back games for starters-turned-relievers, based, of course, on his decade spent as a starting pitcher-turned-reliever.


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Harold Reynolds talking at length about the challenge-- "the biggest thing" about the role-- in pitching back-to-back games for starters-turned-relievers, based, of course, on his decade spent as a starting pitcher-turned-reliever.


Boy do we nitpick!


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Rubin is tweeting that an ex Met believes Royals picked up a tip in jdg delivery. Whatever, we have to hit.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Harold Reynolds talking at length about the challenge-- "the biggest thing" about the role-- in pitching back-to-back games for starters-turned-relievers, based, of course, on his decade spent as a starting pitcher-turned-reliever.


Boy do we nitpick!


Yes, because it's of a piece with most of the other poop coming out of Reynolds' mouth. AND because he tends to rebut thoughtful assertions about stats or analysis with "I know because I've been there" clubbiness.

Conforto just missed that. Fart.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted (edited)


Their defensive positioning has been friggin' uncanny.


Edited by Guest
Guest Mets Willets Point
Guests
Posted


O well, maybe I'll see the Mets win a championship in 2031.


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Their defensive positioning has been friggin' uncanny.

Like Wright's grounder up the middle in the first. What the hell was the second baseman doing there? Urg.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


The less than exemplary defense, all the 0-2 count and 2 out hits surrendered, the total lack of extra base hitting. That stuff bothers me a little.


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


It was too much for Niese, especially after the innings last night.


Posted


Mets � Willets Point wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Centerfield wrote:
This is not good. I wonder if we have just seen the end of this series.

The Mets look as overmatched as the Cubs.


The Mets lost a squeaker Game #1 to Boston in '86 and then got blown out in Game #2.


They also won 108 regular season games.


The Mets as currently constitued prorate to over 100 wins too.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted (edited)


Addison Reed is just the last guy I wanna see with guys on base.

And another 0-2, [crossout:78u4mlb3]2[/crossout:78u4mlb3] 1-out hit. Only 1 out, wtf.


Edited by Guest
Posted


Benjamin Grimm wrote:
If this was a regular season game I'd have gone to bed by now.

7-1 Royals.

As soon as that ball died down the left field corner, I picked up the remote. But I can't.


Posted


We were just pretty much non-existent in this game.

I go back to the 4th inning with the defense; two plays not made -- Duda at 1st and Lagares coming in on the low liner -- forced deGrom into a lengthy inning that seemed to take its toll in inning #5, and then it only got worse from there: no hitting, no fielding, not much pitching.
I do think the Royals are getting a bit lucky in that nothing they hit wound up at anyone - but that only made the gap bigger, it certainly wouldn't have changed the result.


Guest d'Kong76
Guests
Posted


Cy Cueto, ladies and gentlemen... Cy Cueto...


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...