Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 382
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


This sucks but don't forget a split here and we're still lookin' very good.

And I feel a comeback. I had a dream...


Posted


Elster88 wrote:
Also, you can't review the neoghborhood play. I guess that didn't qualify?

Edit: Looks like this was already answered.


Though considering he would've povoted and thrown if he hadn't gotten taken out...

Smells bad.


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


They're saying Tejada never touched the bag there? Wow.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
I think the reasoning here is that Utley ran off the field because he was called out, and now that because the call was reversed he can't be penalized for it.
But they've got to be fucking kidding me if they're going to reverse it on any of the angles that we saw.

But the problem is that he didn't run off the field abandoning the base. He never attained it.


But the logic (I'm guessing) is that if the play was "correctly" called in the first place that Utley would have touched up instead of leaving the field like he was told.
It's just another example of the fallacy that replay can retroactively fix incorrect calls to what supposed to happen.



They're saying this too. Of course, if he hadn't called him out Tejada might have crawled over there and tagged him out.


Posted (edited)


Frayed Knot wrote:

But they've got to be fucking kidding me if they're going to reverse it on any of the angles that we saw.


I didn't think any of the TV angles were conclusive either. And that was no take-out slide. Utley wasn't even trying to touch the bag. He went straight for Tejada who wasn't near the bag. Ripken (clean play) and Darling (dirty play) are disagreeing without saying they are.


Edited by Guest
Posted (edited)


Elster88 wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
I think the reasoning here is that Utley ran off the field because he was called out, and now that because the call was reversed he can't be penalized for it.
But they've got to be fucking kidding me if they're going to reverse it on any of the angles that we saw.

But the problem is that he didn't run off the field abandoning the base. He never attained it.


But the logic (I'm guessing) is that if the play was "correctly" called in the first place that Utley would have touched up instead of leaving the field like he was told.
It's just another example of the fallacy that replay can retroactively fix incorrect calls to what supposed to happen.



They're saying this too. Of course, if he hadn't called him out Tejada might have crawled over there and tagged him out.


Which is why I threw in the second sentence in my reply. -- "It's just another example of the fallacy that replay can retroactively fix incorrect calls to what [was] supposed to happen."


Edited by Guest
Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


I think we need some kind of response, prefererably offensive, right now or they will more or less get away with this shit.


Guest Mets Guy in Michigan
Guests
Posted


Seems like Travis hasn't had a hit in a month.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
I think the reasoning here is that Utley ran off the field because he was called out, and now that because the call was reversed he can't be penalized for it.
But they've got to be fucking kidding me if they're going to reverse it on any of the angles that we saw.

But the problem is that he didn't run off the field abandoning the base. He never attained it.


But the logic (I'm guessing) is that if the play was "correctly" called in the first place that Utley would have touched up instead of leaving the field like he was told.
It's just another example of the fallacy that replay can retroactively fix incorrect calls to what supposed to happen.



They're saying this too. Of course, if he hadn't called him out Tejada might have crawled over there and tagged him out.


Which is why I threw in the second sentence in my reply. -- "It's just another example of the fallacy that replay can retroactively fix incorrect calls to what supposed to happen."

Yeah I gotcha. I agree


Posted


Oh, they're able to respond. Fastball in Adrian Gonzalez's ribs the next time he sets foot in the batter's box.


Posted


The thing about that play is that it could have occurred exactly as it did and been called:
- as no outs (the way it was)
- as one out (the original call)
- or as two outs (had Utley been flagged for an illegal slide and the batter/runner been thumbed on account of it)


Posted


Oh, they're able to respond. Fastball in Adrian Gonzalez's ribs the next time he sets foot in the batter's box.


Robles could do it, half the league already hates him.


Posted


Gwreck wrote:
Oh, they're able to respond. Fastball in Adrian Gonzalez's ribs the next time he sets foot in the batter's box.

This. Or in Utley's earhole.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
The thing about that play is that it could have occurred exactly as it did and been called:
- as no outs (the way it was)
- as one out (the original call)
- or as two outs (had Utley been flagged for an illegal slide and the batter/runner been thumbed on account of it)



It's gross.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Yeah but what we really need is the lead back.


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Yeah but what we really need is the lead back.


Exactly.


Posted


TransMonk wrote:
I'm also worried about the sudden lack of SS on this team.

All Flores all the time?


Kelly Johnson played a little shortstop this year, but if I recall correctly, nobody hit the ball to him.

David Wright has played shortstop too, but I wouldn't want to put him there at this point in his career.

They can activate Eric Campbell. He's played 6 innings in the big leagues at shortstop.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Here we go guys.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Still haven't heard a good explanation of this, from MLB or any of its online apologists. It's basically make-shit-up rulefakery.

And, y'know, that slide was cool with old school Cal and his ilk, right? But God FORBID Utley, say, fails to properly run out a foregone-conclusion pop up or something.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...