Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
What square peg? He looked better at first-- quick, surprisingly decisive-- than he ever looked in the outfield; if he had one fault there, it was trying to cover too much ground... which is much less of a flaw at the keystone.


The square peg where you take someone who was a bat-first corner player throughout his amateur and minor league career and try to re-make him in the middle of the diamond in the majors at age 25.



Mora turned out to be just fine


But not as a short-stop.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Even beyond the different arm-strength requirements, there's a world of difference between second and short. Murphy's defensive tendencies seem to favor his development at that particular position-- as much as they can for someone who, as you point out, is trying a new position in young adulthood-- as long as he gets sufficient practice making the throws.

He sure as hell won't be a Gold Glover, at least not this year. But even if he's only a faking-it occasional second baseman, he's better defensively than at least one starter in the division, and he becomes a cheap DeRosa-type.


Posted


In general, the more managers display the courage to push players as far right along the defensive spectrum as they can, the better. Replacing a fielder with a hitter can be so valuable.


Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Guests
Posted


Really. Does anyone here dissent with that?


Posted


LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Really. Does anyone here dissent with that?


Are you kidding? Me -- I went with Gates Brown StratOMaticv71 all season (LF 4 (+4))* and won the crown.


*Those are defensive ratings. That's what Mo Vaughn would rate if he played left field.


Posted


I'm all for giving Murph the opportunity and think he can be "a faking-it occasional second baseman".
Of course that's not the same thing as an everyday one and for all the Mitchell at SS memories it's a spot he played 25 times in his career, 20 of them starts. I suspect Muffy will get more than that but, again, not full time.


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
What square peg? He looked better at first-- quick, surprisingly decisive-- than he ever looked in the outfield; if he had one fault there, it was trying to cover too much ground... which is much less of a flaw at the keystone.


The square peg where you take someone who was a bat-first corner player throughout his amateur and minor league career and try to re-make him in the middle of the diamond in the majors at age 25.



Mora turned out to be just fine


But not as a short-stop.


Precisely my point. We're putting a lot of good wishes on this one with very little to back it up. Sure, Murphy eventually looked passable at first, but Ike Davis has closed off that option.

This team has played people out of their normal positions so consistently over the years it amazes me.


Posted


I don't think Murphy eventually looked passable at first. I think he was always fine there (more than passable), and Manuel eventually got around to getting past his infielder's prejudice that any fool can play outfield and anybody who can't certainly shouldn't be let in the infield.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


[FMan]Osprey in her face![/FMan]


Guest El Segundo Escupidor
Guests
Posted


Imposing personal fantasies on others...not cool.


  • 1 month later...
Grand Central Contributor
Posted


Edgy DC wrote:
Murph played nine innings in right field in a minor league exhibition yesterday.


scheduled to start in RF today in the Grapefruit, but unlikely due to the torrential downpour and the St. Lucie Mets not bothering to tarp the field before hand.


  • 2 months later...
Posted


Murph definitely exhibited the arm for third base last night, and it's a shame his managers haven't given him more of an opportunity to spell Wright over there on occasion.

His overaggression on the basepaths, that's a different story.


Old-Timey Member
Posted


Ceetar wrote:
Mora turned out to be just fine, maybe Murph will too.


Well, he's proven he can hit ok. But can he father quintuplets?

Later


Posted


Daniel Murphy through May 6: .244 / .311 / .402 // .714.

Daneil Murphy through June 6: 309 / .366 / .433 // .799.

Turned a corner or merely hot?


Posted


Last 28 days: .368 / .421 / .471 // .892

Last 14 days: .500 / .540 / .565 // 1.105

Last 7 days: .550 / .591 / .550 //1.141


Posted


Turned a corner or merely hot?


are you suggesting he's turned the corner and he's now a .500 hitter?
i think i'll vote for "merely hot". Not that there's anything wrong with that.


Guest John Cougar Lunchbucket
Guests
Posted


Mole's winning this one so far.

My Boswellian future for him seems pretty pessimistic.

He's going up there with an idea again.


Posted


Vic Sage wrote:
Turned a corner or merely hot?


are you suggesting he's turned the corner and he's now a .500 hitter?

No.


Posted


well, then you've answered your own question. a reversion to the mean is imminent. But i may agree with you that he HAS turned some kind of corner. It's just difficult to assess what neighborhood that corner is in, when he's this hot. We have more than 1/2 a season to go to see where his reversion ultimately lands him.

I still think a .275-.280/ 15-20hr hitter is in there somewhere, which is excellent for a 2bman and less impressive for a corner man. Playing 1b is giving him ABs, but i don't think he has a future there and it retarding his growth at 2b. Not that there is anything to be done about it while Davis is out.


Posted


well, then you've answered your own question.

Don't be such a smart guy.

If Wright and Davis returned tomorrow, would you try and steal some time for Murphy in left? I sure would.


Posted


Don't be such a smart guy.


who are you, my 7th grade social studies teacher?

If Wright and Davis returned tomorrow, would you try and steal some time for Murphy in left? I sure would.


I sure would, too. But it's not stealing if Bay is giving it away. I'd platoon them until either Murphy stopped hitting, or Bay started.

I guess i'd like to see him get as many opps as possible at 2b, to finally determine whether he can be adequate defensively. but if not, ultimately, I see Murph as a supersub, getting ABs at 1b, 2b, 3b, LF & Rf, as well as PH and DH. He could give us 400 productive ABs a season that way. But i don't see him as an everyday player unless his bat can carry his glove at 2b (Turner seems to be a better balanced option at this point), as his bat is likely inadequate for the corners (either IF or OF).


Old-Timey Member
Posted


He's on a pace for similar numbers to his 2009 season everywhere except batting average, and this was actually true when he was hitting below .250 as well. He's gotten a flurry of singles lately, but I figure he'll wind up about where he was in 2009.


Grand Central Contributor
Posted


smg58 wrote:
He's on a pace for similar numbers to his 2009 season everywhere except batting average, and this was actually true when he was hitting below .250 as well. He's gotten a flurry of singles lately, but I figure he'll wind up about where he was in 2009.


I was figuring a slight up-tick for him from 2009 in 2010. Dunno how a lost season plays into his overall growth.


  • 1 month later...
Posted


Since May 21 --- a jerry-rigged, if not insignificant, period --- Daniel Murphy is tied with Adrian Gonzalez for most hits in MLB, according to Anthony DiComo


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted


Smart boy, that Murph... blowing out a knee before his production reverted to the mean.
But a great 1/2 season, Muffy!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...