Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 The alleged 2003 Steroid List:http://rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=3181.Nomar Garciaparra2.Manny Ramirez3.Johnny Damon4.Trot Nixon5.David Ortiz6.Shea Hillenbrand7.Derek Lowe8.Pedro Martinez9.Brian Roberts10.Jay Gibbons11.Melvin Mora12.Jerry Hairston13.Jason Giambi14.Alfonso Soriano15.Raul Mondesi16. Aaron Boone17.Andy Pettitte18.Jose Contreras19.Roger Clemens20.Carlos Delgado21.Vernon Wells22.Frank Catalanotto23.Kenny Rogers24.Magglio Ordonez25.Sandy Alomar26.Bartolo Colon27.Brent Abernathy28.Jose Lima29.Milton Bradley30.Casey Blake31.Danys Baez32.Craig Monroe33.Dmitri Young34.Alex Sanchez35.Eric Chavez36.Miguel Tejada37.Eric Byrnes38.Jose Guillen39.Keith Foulke40.Ricardo Rincon41.Bret Boone42.Mike Cameron43.Randy Winn44.Ryan Franklin45.Freddy Garcia46.Rafael Soriano47.Scott Spiezio48.Troy Glaus49.Francisco Rodriguez50.Ben Weber51.Alex Rodriguez52.Juan Gonzalez53.Rafael Palmeiro54.Carl Everett55.Javy Lopez56.Gary Sheffield57.Mike Hampton58.Ivan Rodriguez59.Derrek Lee60.Bobby Abreu61.Terry Adams62.Fernando Tatis63.Livan Hernandez64.Hector Almonte65.Tony Armas66.Dan Smith67.Roberto Alomar68.Cliff Floyd69.Roger Cedeno70.Jeromy Burnitz71.Moises Alou72.Sammy Sosa73.Corey Patterson74.Carlos Zambrano75.Mark Prior76.Kerry Wood77.Matt Clement78.Antonio Alfonseca79.Juan Cruz80.Aramis Ramirez81.Craig Wilson82.Kris Benson83.Richie Sexson84.Geoff Jenkins85.Valerio de los Santos86.Benito Santiago87.Rich Aurilia88.Barry Bonds89.Andres Galarraga90.Jason Schmidt91.Felix Rodriguez92.Jason Christiansen93.Matt Herges94.Paul Lo Duca95.Shawn Green96.Jeromy Burnitz97.Adrian Beltre98.Eric Gagne99.Guillermo Mota100.Luis Gonzalez101.Todd Helton102.Ryan Klesko103.Gary Matthews104.Oliver Perep
Benjamin Grimm Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 They might as well shut down the Hall of Fame for a decade or two.
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 I don't see Piazza , do I ?None on that list at a very quick glance surprise me...
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Author Posted June 29, 2009 Of course, Piazza was hurt for much of 2003...
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Antonio Alfonseca Everyone knows: non-cheating normals don't have six fingers.
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Tons o' Mets, current and former, on this list.Current:Carlos DelgadoFrankie RodriguezGary SheffieldFernando TatisLivan HernandezOliver PerezFormer:Pedro MartinezMelvin MoraKenny RogersSandy AlomarJose LimaMike CameronMike HamptonTony ArmasRoberto AlomarCliff FloydRoger CedenoJeromy BurnitzMoises AlouKris BensonPaul LoDucaShawn GreenGuillermo MotaNot counting Freddy Garcia and Bret Boone who were spring training Mets.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Author Posted June 29, 2009 ="Benjamin Grimm":32eg1nc2]They might as well shut down the Hall of Fame for a decade or two.[/quote:32eg1nc2]I count 8 obvious HOF candidates plus two others:Pedro MartinezRoger ClemensBarry BondsSammy SosaRafael PalmeiroManny RamirezAlex RodriguezIvan RodriguezRoberto Alomar (?)Gary Sheffield (?)bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 11:32 AM"Not counting Freddy Garcia and Bret Boone who were spring training Mets."As was Valerio de los Santos.Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?Gwreck Jun 29 2009 11:33 AMCarl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.Gwreck Jun 29 2009 11:44 AM="bmfc1":355jydkl]Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?[/quote:355jydkl]The list appeared to be sorted by division and team, so you get Alomar, Cedeno, Burnitz and Floyd all listed together. Those are your '03 Mets.Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 11:45 AMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 11:48 AM="bmfc1":n44vb3vz]"Not counting Freddy Garcia and Bret Boone who were spring training Mets."As was Valerio de los Santos.Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?[/quote:n44vb3vz]Hey, Art Howe ran a clean clubhouse!!!Meanwhile...13.Jason Giambi 14.Alfonso Soriano 15.Raul Mondesi 16.Aaron Boone 17.Andy Pettitte 18.Jose Contreras 19.Roger Clemens These are the only Yankees? You-gotta-be-kiddin'-me!Farmer Ted Jun 29 2009 11:46 AMI thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 11:48 AM"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:50 AM="Farmer Ted":3o2b1z4y]I thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.[/quote:3o2b1z4y]I wonder what Moistest Alou is doing these days.Gwreck Jun 29 2009 11:52 AM="bmfc1":3hsdd5wp]"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.[/quote:3hsdd5wp]I know. You'd think the list still would've only had him on there once. Did somebody go through the list of players on each team, find who was plausible, and put this together? (And simply forget that Burnitz was already on there)? Or perhaps Jeromy tested positive twice, once with each team.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:54 AM="Gwreck":3pm0hlqj]Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.[/quote:3pm0hlqj]Thanks... I figured that I would miss a few.G-Fafif Jun 29 2009 12:18 PMIt appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 12:58 PManyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.Edgy DC Jun 29 2009 01:12 PMHey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.smg58 Jun 29 2009 01:17 PMIs anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 29 2009 01:20 PMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 01:44 PMAfter the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form.metirish Jun 29 2009 01:39 PMBob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 01:41 PM="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
bmfc1 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 "Not counting Freddy Garcia and Bret Boone who were spring training Mets."As was Valerio de los Santos.Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Author Posted June 29, 2009 Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Author Posted June 29, 2009 ="bmfc1":355jydkl]Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?[/quote:355jydkl]The list appeared to be sorted by division and team, so you get Alomar, Cedeno, Burnitz and Floyd all listed together. Those are your '03 Mets.Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 11:45 AMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 11:48 AM="bmfc1":n44vb3vz]"Not counting Freddy Garcia and Bret Boone who were spring training Mets."As was Valerio de los Santos.Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?[/quote:n44vb3vz]Hey, Art Howe ran a clean clubhouse!!!Meanwhile...13.Jason Giambi 14.Alfonso Soriano 15.Raul Mondesi 16.Aaron Boone 17.Andy Pettitte 18.Jose Contreras 19.Roger Clemens These are the only Yankees? You-gotta-be-kiddin'-me!Farmer Ted Jun 29 2009 11:46 AMI thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 11:48 AM"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:50 AM="Farmer Ted":3o2b1z4y]I thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.[/quote:3o2b1z4y]I wonder what Moistest Alou is doing these days.Gwreck Jun 29 2009 11:52 AM="bmfc1":3hsdd5wp]"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.[/quote:3hsdd5wp]I know. You'd think the list still would've only had him on there once. Did somebody go through the list of players on each team, find who was plausible, and put this together? (And simply forget that Burnitz was already on there)? Or perhaps Jeromy tested positive twice, once with each team.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:54 AM="Gwreck":3pm0hlqj]Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.[/quote:3pm0hlqj]Thanks... I figured that I would miss a few.G-Fafif Jun 29 2009 12:18 PMIt appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 12:58 PManyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.Edgy DC Jun 29 2009 01:12 PMHey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.smg58 Jun 29 2009 01:17 PMIs anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 29 2009 01:20 PMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 01:44 PMAfter the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form.metirish Jun 29 2009 01:39 PMBob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 01:41 PM="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
Guest metsguyinmichigan Guests Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 (edited) ="bmfc1":n44vb3vz]"Not counting Freddy Garcia and Bret Boone who were spring training Mets."As was Valerio de los Santos.Not to split hairs, but were any of the named on the Mets in '03?[/quote:n44vb3vz]Hey, Art Howe ran a clean clubhouse!!!Meanwhile...13.Jason Giambi 14.Alfonso Soriano 15.Raul Mondesi 16.Aaron Boone 17.Andy Pettitte 18.Jose Contreras 19.Roger Clemens These are the only Yankees? You-gotta-be-kiddin'-me!Farmer Ted Jun 29 2009 11:46 AMI thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 11:48 AM"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:50 AM="Farmer Ted":3o2b1z4y]I thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.[/quote:3o2b1z4y]I wonder what Moistest Alou is doing these days.Gwreck Jun 29 2009 11:52 AM="bmfc1":3hsdd5wp]"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.[/quote:3hsdd5wp]I know. You'd think the list still would've only had him on there once. Did somebody go through the list of players on each team, find who was plausible, and put this together? (And simply forget that Burnitz was already on there)? Or perhaps Jeromy tested positive twice, once with each team.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:54 AM="Gwreck":3pm0hlqj]Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.[/quote:3pm0hlqj]Thanks... I figured that I would miss a few.G-Fafif Jun 29 2009 12:18 PMIt appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 12:58 PManyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.Edgy DC Jun 29 2009 01:12 PMHey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.smg58 Jun 29 2009 01:17 PMIs anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 29 2009 01:20 PMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 01:44 PMAfter the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form.metirish Jun 29 2009 01:39 PMBob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 01:41 PM="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits.. Edited June 29, 2009 by Guest
Farmer Ted Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 I thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.
bmfc1 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 "Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 ="Farmer Ted":3o2b1z4y]I thought Moises got his power from pissing on his hands.[/quote:3o2b1z4y]I wonder what Moistest Alou is doing these days.Gwreck Jun 29 2009 11:52 AM="bmfc1":3hsdd5wp]"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.[/quote:3hsdd5wp]I know. You'd think the list still would've only had him on there once. Did somebody go through the list of players on each team, find who was plausible, and put this together? (And simply forget that Burnitz was already on there)? Or perhaps Jeromy tested positive twice, once with each team.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:54 AM="Gwreck":3pm0hlqj]Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.[/quote:3pm0hlqj]Thanks... I figured that I would miss a few.G-Fafif Jun 29 2009 12:18 PMIt appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 12:58 PManyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.Edgy DC Jun 29 2009 01:12 PMHey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.smg58 Jun 29 2009 01:17 PMIs anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 29 2009 01:20 PMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 01:44 PMAfter the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form.metirish Jun 29 2009 01:39 PMBob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 01:41 PM="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Author Posted June 29, 2009 ="bmfc1":3hsdd5wp]"Interestingly, Burnitz is listed again, but with the Dodgers players. Don't know if that's indicative of the list being fake or not."The Mets traded him to the Dodgers during the '03 season:07-14-2003: Traded by New York Mets to Los Angeles Dodgers for Victor Diaz and Jose Diaz.[/quote:3hsdd5wp]I know. You'd think the list still would've only had him on there once. Did somebody go through the list of players on each team, find who was plausible, and put this together? (And simply forget that Burnitz was already on there)? Or perhaps Jeromy tested positive twice, once with each team.Fman99 Jun 29 2009 11:54 AM="Gwreck":3pm0hlqj]Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.[/quote:3pm0hlqj]Thanks... I figured that I would miss a few.G-Fafif Jun 29 2009 12:18 PMIt appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 12:58 PManyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.Edgy DC Jun 29 2009 01:12 PMHey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.smg58 Jun 29 2009 01:17 PMIs anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 29 2009 01:20 PMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 01:44 PMAfter the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form.metirish Jun 29 2009 01:39 PMBob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 01:41 PM="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
Fman99 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 ="Gwreck":3pm0hlqj]Carl Everett and Gary Matthews were also Mets.[/quote:3pm0hlqj]Thanks... I figured that I would miss a few.G-Fafif Jun 29 2009 12:18 PMIt appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 12:58 PManyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.Edgy DC Jun 29 2009 01:12 PMHey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.smg58 Jun 29 2009 01:17 PMIs anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 29 2009 01:20 PMEdited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 29 2009 01:44 PMAfter the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form.metirish Jun 29 2009 01:39 PMBob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 01:41 PM="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
G-Fafif Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 It appears most of the '03 Mets were no better at alleged juicing than they were at baseball.
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.
Guest Edgy DC Guests Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Hey, wait, Gwynn and Ripken were done by 2003. As for Jeter, soft rain isn't on any banned list I know.
smg58 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Is anybody else reporting this? And if not, who is rotoinfo claiming as the source?
Guest LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Guests Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 (edited) After the better part of an afternoon searching, I've only seen this "list" on other message boards, and in similarly unsourced form. Edited June 29, 2009 by Guest
metirish Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:32jw2hte]
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 ="Nymr83":4s13xmfx]anyone can make a fake list look plausible by sprikling in the cheats we know (Clemens, Arod, Giambi) the cheats we've long suspected (Juan Gonzalez, Miguel Tejada) and some random names (Abernathy, Christiansen, Mota) while avoiding those we'd hate to suspect (Ripken, Jeter, Gwynn).i can't call bullshit on the "list" but theres just no way to take it seriously either.[/quote:4s13xmfx]It does read a bit much like something a MFY fan would put together as many names are "thorns" in Yankee sides and such.bmfc1 Jun 29 2009 01:43 PM="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
bmfc1 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 ="metirish":dswu7m3p]Bob Klapisch has in the past shared concern regarding Jeter.......hilarious reading here Derek, don't fail us now[/url:dswu7m3p][/quote:dswu7m3p]A nation turns its lonely eyes to you....OlerudOwned Jun 29 2009 05:25 PMLooks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.SteveJRogers Jun 29 2009 05:35 PMYup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!Nymr83 Jun 29 2009 05:46 PM"In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.metsguyinmichigan Jun 29 2009 06:04 PMNo Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??Frayed Knot Jun 29 2009 07:02 PMLegit or Fake?Don't know, don't care.attgig Jun 30 2009 10:10 AM2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list http://www.rotoinfo.com/read_article.php?articleId=318(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 10:10 AMwe had a post about this yesterday(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 10:55 AMSee the 'Legit or Fake' thread lower down on the page.The consensus seems to be that this thing appears nowhere except for this roto-site and who knows where they picked it up from. That real news orgs (or even ESPN) aren't touching it makes you think that there's no credible source behind it. So it's probably speculation even though it could be partially or even mostly correct - but I don't even care at this point. When this 2003 list does leak (and you know it eventually will) it's still just going to be merely a snapshot of that moment and certainly not remotely the last word on who is tainted and who is pure.(Merged from 2003 Unconfirmed Steroid list, 6/30/2009)Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 11:11 AMExcept now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 11:13 AM="Frayed Knot":2ox6bx81]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ox6bx81]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread!LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 30 2009 11:29 AMTommy Craggs of Deadspin dissects a few problematic aspects of the list. Exhibit A?]For one thing, Jason Grimsley's name is absent. Grimsley, you'll recall, has been confirmed as one of the Juicin' 104. http://deadspin.com/5304675/why-the-new-alleged-steroids-list-is-a-crock?skyline=true&s=iTriple Dee Jun 30 2009 11:58 AMEven some of the names make it pretty dubious. Call me naive if you like, but I'd be shocked if Delgado ever juiced (Beltran, otoh, I could believe).However, whoever put the list together was thinking; Delgado had a career year in 2003 + Delgado's from PR + Steriods are probably easier to acquire in PR + Delgado's numbers have dropped since 2003 = Delgado's on the list.The formula works for a large percentage of players on the list.seawolf17 Jun 30 2009 12:01 PMThe list is patently fake, for all the reasons everyone's listed. It's just too convenient. OO's probably right. It's directing a lot of traffic to that roto site, which probably helps their ad revenue, though.Frayed Knot Jun 30 2009 12:05 PM="Nymr83":27xputm1]="Frayed Knot":27xputm1]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:27xputm1]beats having duplicate threads. this problem is also easily solved by reading every thread![/quote:27xputm1]And God knows how there's a finite supply of threads so we have to conserve them ... like oil.Point being that 'Attgig' is a long-time, though less active, poster who, less than an hour after he brings up a topic, has it disappear on him. Now maybe he reads more than he posts or maybe he just missed that one, but I think sometimes in our relish to "tidy up" the board and preserve those always-endangered threads we don't consider all the angles.In this case, I think both the rush to merge and the brusque 'we already talked about that' didn't do anyone any favors. There needn't be some kind of full-time or not-at-all requirement to post here.Nymr83 Jun 30 2009 12:23 PMmultiple threads bump other useful threads to the 2nd page and they create duplication of discussion and confusion. take a look at some other forums and you'll see how annoying it is when unpoliced. nobody is saying attgig or whoever else did something bad, but its proper to point out the duplicate and merge it.attgig Jun 30 2009 12:50 PM="Frayed Knot":2ptcrfj5]Except now that if 'Attgig' goes looking responses to his less-than-hour-old thread on the steroids list he won't be able to find it and think he was censored or something.[/quote:2ptcrfj5]dangit, where'd my thread go?attgig Jun 30 2009 12:56 PMas for the list, i think it's pretty well made up list, but I don't see how rotoinfo is going to get away with it if it's fake....even qualifying it as a rumor could open itself up to libel/slander lawsuits..
Guest OlerudOwned Guests Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Looks like somebody just cobbled together whatever names they could remember from 2003. Seems as if they ran down team rosters and grabbed the notable looking names, and slapped them down in order.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 Yup. And as LWFS said, its not showing up anywhere except on message boards. Yes I'm sure me and DGW will get that, but the scene it is from is classic overacting with just the line, IT'S A FAKE!
nymr83 Old-Timey Member Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 "In the Pale Moonlight" was my favorite episode of Deep Space Nine.
Guest metsguyinmichigan Guests Posted June 29, 2009 Posted June 29, 2009 No Astros or Twins? No Bagwell??
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts