Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Green DL'd - Johnson up


Frayed Knot

Recommended Posts

Posted


They had been thinking that Alou might be ready for tonight's game.

Guess not.

So the big question for now is, will Johnson be able to get into a game as the 813th Met before Alou returns?


Guest attgig
Guests
Posted


his name is ben.
ben johnson.
came from SD
in a trade
along with adkins
We gave up Heath and Ring
this past winter.
he's still young enough, but hasn't proven himself to be any better than a utility OF'er at this point.


Posted


attgig wrote:
his name is ben.
ben johnson.
came from SD
in a trade
along with adkins
We gave up Heath and Ring
this past winter.
he's still young enough, but hasn't proven himself to be any better than a utility OF'er at this point.


That structure is joelmon-esque. Thanks.


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


I read somewhere this weekend that though Alou was eligible to come off the DL, he didn't feel that he was ready. He said that the point was for him to be 100% again, then he would return. Otherwise the Mets would run the risk of him reinjuring himself and needing to go back on to the DL. He said that he felt he would be ready to return to action possibley this weekend.

Welcome to Ben Johnson.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Jen Bonson?



Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


fitness author, Jon Benson.


Guest Rockin' Doc
Guests
Posted


Great minds think alike, but Seawolf was too quick for me.


Posted


Meanwhile, Bell and Ring have been great for SD, while Adkins is ... where? AAA? another team? pumping gas?

Johnson better show something or this will go down as one of Omar's bad deals.


Posted


Bell's been good, but Ring's pitched all of 2 innings and has spent most of the year in the minors.


Meanwhile (to no one's surprise) Mota up -- Burgos down.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Great. Ring has been great.


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


Johnson looks to have that swing I hate where one hand comes off the bat like a righthanded Jeromy Burnitz, though not quite as pronounced.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Lefties are more prone to that, which I guess makes it worse to see on righties. Winfield fell into that when he was going bad.


Guest iramets
Guests
Posted


Probably this is a whole thread in itself, but why should lefties (in theory) do that (or anything) differently from righties? McCarver likes to claim that lefties are better low-ball hitters than righties, but he's never begun to explain why that should be so. Lefties are just righties batting from the wrong side, aren't they? Other than the step closer to first base, should they have any substantial advantages or disadvantages? If so, why?


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


A million theories. Mine is that lefties always have to open up to run to first, and righties have to dive closed. So lefties are more vulnerable to the sins of opening up, one of which is the one-handed flail.


Guest Johnny Dickshot
Guests
Posted


Stan Bahnsen?


Posted


Frayed Knot wrote:
Bell's been good, but Ring's pitched all of 2 innings and has spent most of the year in the minors..


Yeah, but those were 2 great innings!

And Bell's been better than "good" (30 IP / 17 H / 6 BB / 34 K / 1.20 ERA)


Guest iramets
Guests
Posted


="Willets Point"]Ban Johnson?



That old guy took steroids? Bet on baseball? What?


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I think it's way too early to be looking to judge the trade. Johnson's here to be insurance, and that's a policy that looks like it's about to be cashed in, with perhaps our third starting outfielder disabled tonight, along with our top AAA outfielder.

We may need to call up Ricky Ledee now, and we might've had to earlier had they not put in as much redunancy as they did.


Guest attgig
Guests
Posted


ring's AAA numbers


22IP, 1-0, 0.82, 2ER, 14H, 8BB, 29K



I'd say he's ready for the majors....


This was a bad trade ultimately, but honestly, neither ring nor bell had any value. We all thought they would be pretty good MR, but for unproven commodities, nobody was going to give up an arm and a leg.
And with the depth we have in our pen, we really didn't need more MR arms. signing shoeeeeenweis negated a need for ring.

I'll put this out there, though.
Omar had no business giving SS a 3 year contract. I can understand that this was the year mets have to win it all. and you want a proven lefty in the pen. but.. sometimes, you just have to trust your guys. and if ring was there instead of SS, i think we all would've been pleasantly surprised. Then, the trade wouldn't have had to happen. and we'd all be happy with another MR rising to dependability out of nowhere (ie joe smith).


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Ring may'nt have gotten the chance because he had a predecessor's fingerprints on him.

A middle reliever with gaudy numbers may look better than a reserve outfielder with modest numbers when all is said and done, but we'll see.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...