stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Not getting ahead of anything here, as the O's may look like a mediocre push over, but they are "feisty", and if they do get past the O's, well the Jays are just 2 back of the Yankees and Red Sox, so they are a bonafide "tough out" but the Mets are 3 wins shy of the tying the team mark of 11 wins in a row, done 4 times previous5/28-6/10 19695/12-5/21 19724/18-4/30 19866/17-6/29 1990OE: Don't ask, too much going on today I guess...
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted June 15, 2006 Posted June 15, 2006 Mets actually won their 8th in a row today. A sweep of Baltimore will tie.
stevejrogers Old-Timey Member Posted June 15, 2006 Author Posted June 15, 2006 Willets Point wrote:Mets actually won their 8th in a row today. A sweep of Baltimore will tie.Its fixed
Willets Point Old-Timey Member Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 I like that the two of the previous streaks were in '69 & '86.
DocTee Old-Timey Member Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 A series loss here might be GOOD. Non-divisional opponent (hell, non-league, so the effect is mitigated) and it would prevent the Mets from the big-headedness so prevalent around these parts.
Gwreck Old-Timey Member Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 ="DocTee"]A series loss here might be GOOD. Non-divisional opponent (hell, non-league, so the effect is mitigated) and it would prevent the Mets from the big-headedness so prevalent around these parts.1. Losing is never good. Some wins might be better than others but losing always sucks.2. Big-headedness? I don't see it, at least not yet. I think everybody's fully aware of what the calendar reads.3. If there is big-headness to be had, great! I'm all for some confidence and swagger from the players. It's been sorely missed.
The Big O Old-Timey Member Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 Gwreck wrote:3. If there is big-headness to be had, great! I'm all for some confidence and swagger from the players. It's been sorely missed.Nope, that'd be worrisome. Better send all such players with out-of-whack attitudes down to Norfolk when Nady comes back.
Frayed Knot Old-Timey Member Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 'All this winning is terrible'(long-timers are chuckling here)
Elster88 Old-Timey Member Posted June 16, 2006 Posted June 16, 2006 DocTee wrote:A series loss here might be GOOD. Non-divisional opponent (hell, non-league, so the effect is mitigated) and it would prevent the Mets from the big-headedness so prevalent around these parts.An interesting thought, but ultimately I disagree.The only players who haven't struggled (much) at some point this season are Wright and Beltran.Everyone else has had at least one large individual slump. I think that's just as important in controlling big-headedness.
Zach Thornton Syracuse Mets - AAA LHP On Sunday, the southpaw tossed five shutout innings as the bulk pitcher. He gave up 2 hits, walked 2 and had 5 strikeouts. Explore Zach Thornton News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.