Jump to content
Grand Central Mets
  • Create Account

Houston Astros vs. Chicago White Sox - World Series 2005


Valadius

Recommended Posts

Guest sharpie
Guests
Posted


So ratings are down 30% from last year but the games are more than 30% better than last year's World Series which frankly was a bore.


  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted


"Chicago is the second biggest market in the Country and Houston the fourth"

Splitting hairs a bit here, but while they are the 3rd (Chicago) and 4th largest cities in the country, Houston only ranks as the 10th largest market (as judged by size of metropolitan area, number of TV sets available, etc.).

I don't get bent out of shape over this stuff anyway. The networks' share of the total viewership goes down every year as consumer choices go up and if people (and media types) want to miss or constantly put down the series simply for it's lack of "glamour" teams then that's their problem.
Also, that 30% number is just a comparison (and all these are just estimates anyway) of game 1 vs game 1 last year. The verdict on the whole series isn't in yet.


Posted


I don't know how tv markets are measured but according to this source Chicago is the 3rd largest metro area with 9,333,511 people and Houston the 8th with 5,075,733. Compared to last year Boston is the 11th largest metro area and St. Louis the 18th, so in the home teams areas alone there is already a bigger potential audience. Obviously both the Red Sox and Cardinals have large followings nationwide that this year's teams probably don't have.


Posted


Btw, when Clemens wussed out in Game 1, did anyone think about the way he blew up at the ump in Game 4 of the 1990 ALCS? That was when Clemens was ejected in the second inning after giving up the lead and then left his bullpen to work their way out of the bases loaded one out situation. If I ever hear again about what a "gamer" that fuckhead is I'll lose it...


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


That's exactly what I was thinking of. Both of those instances.

I say he pitches again in this series.


Posted


He also once got in a fit of roid rage and threw a shard of broken bat at a baserunner in the first inning of a World Series game. Somehow he did not get ejected for that, although WS history may be different had the umps had the cajones to do so.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Wow! What a fierce competitor!


Posted


It was such an honour to watch one of the great competitors of the game pitch into the second inning the other night.


Guest ScarletKnight41
Guests
Posted


Willets Point wrote:
He also once got in a fit of roid rage and threw a shard of broken bat at a baserunner in the first inning of a World Series game. Somehow he did not get ejected for that, although WS history may be different had the umps had the cajones to do so.


MK definitely attributes Fuckface's bat shard throwing behavior to steriods.

That kid is my source - he's very bright.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


I wasn't challenging the roidy stuff, just a-joking about Willets playfully reporting as if we missed the incident.


Guest ScarletKnight41
Guests
Posted


I know. I'm just playing along.


Guest mlbaseballtalk
Guests
Posted


Centerfield wrote:
Brantley's an idiot. Accusing someone of "falling in love" with one pitch or another is idiotic. Let's say a pitcher throws a fastball by a hitter for strike 1. If he throws a slider on his second pitch that gets hit for a HR, he will be accused of changing pitches "even after the hitter has demonstrated he can't hit the fastball". If he throws another fastball that gets hit for a HR, he "falls in love with one pitch." The problem is usually not the pitch selection, it's pitch quality. But analysts would sound awfully boring just repeating "well, he needs to make a better pitch..."


Add that to the fact that most closers only throw one or two pitches. Mariano Rivera has built an entire legacy on just his cutter, hate to use another MFY but Sparky Lyle threw nothing BUT a slider, and I could go on, and on, and on...

That really is shoddy and lazy analysis right there.

He got beat with his best stuff, plain and simple.


Guest mlbaseballtalk
Guests
Posted


Wonder if that HR shut every MFY fan crying about how Posednik of all people beat out Jeter for that 32nd man voting for the AS game.

Gee, maybe he really DID deserve to be on the All Star Game...

I mean I've heard people actually claim that it was a giant Anti-Yankee, Anti-Jeter conpiracy that a White Sox won the voting

Probably was, but still leave it to MFY fans to whimper instead of ya know, DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

I'll put this on another thread as its a completely seperate topic, but I had an enitre breakdown of Yankee AS selections by fan voting since 1970, and in general, MFY fans, don't "rock the vote" so in theory, they can do something besides whining about their guys not getting voted in

Steve


Posted


]Gee, maybe he really DID deserve to be on the All Star Game...


he did, but his performance now has nothing to do with that. the fan voting is what it is and theres not much you can do, but the reserves should be picked based solely on their stats up until that point of the year.


Guest mlbaseballtalk
Guests
Posted


Nymr83 wrote:
]Gee, maybe he really DID deserve to be on the All Star Game...


he did, but his performance now has nothing to do with that. the fan voting is what it is and theres not much you can do, but the reserves should be picked based solely on their stats up until that point of the year.


I know, I'm just poking fun at that whole Jeter vs Posednik thing, especially considering what Posednik is doing in what is considered Jeter's "domain" of October Baseball


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Paul Lukas, a lifelong Mets fan, still hasn't fully recovered from the 2000 World Series (not because the Mets lost, but because they wore their horrific black jerseys in Games 1 and 4, and didn't wear their blue caps even once).


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


A guy who looks like Francis Buxton from Pee Wee's Big Adventure just helped the 'Stros get a walk by legally interfering with a foul pop.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Looks like Barbara Bush is sitting behind home plate, but escorted by one of her sons (Neil?) and not her hubby.


Guest Edgy DC
Guests
Posted


Posting alone here.

Forced quirkiness in ballpark design is looking silly right now.


Guest ScarletKnight41
Guests
Posted


It always looks silly.

One day someone is going to rip up an ankle on that stupid hill.


Guest ScarletKnight41
Guests
Posted


Chicago has come alive in the top of the 5th and have taken a 5-4 lead.


Posted


ScarletKnight41 wrote:
Chicago has come alive in the top of the 5th and have taken a 5-4 lead.


Im kinda in shock that the Sox took the lead. I thought Oswalt was cruisin.
It coulda been way worse tho....Houstons still in it.

But 5 runs in one inning? Off Oswalt....
OUCH


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund
The Grand Central Mets Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Mets community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...